Search for: "Schwartz v. State"
Results 241 - 260
of 975
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2018, 11:36 am
Case Background The case, entitled Harvey v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 11:36 am
Case Background The case, entitled Harvey v. [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 9:50 am
Case Background The case, entitled Harvey v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 3:43 am
In Feldmeier v Feldmeier Equipment, Inc., 2018 NY Slip Op 05893 [4th Dept Aug. 22, 2018], the Albany-based Appellate Division, Fourth Department, over a one-judge dissent, affirmed a decision and order issued by Justice Donald A. [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
" Finally, under the circumstances of this case, the Appellate Division concluded that the penalty of dismissal from SUNY Albany imposed on Petitioner was not disproportionate to the offense, citing Lampert v State Univ. of N.Y. at Albany, 116 AD3d 1292, leave to appeal denied, 23 NY3d 908. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 6:16 am
In Medidata Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 6:16 am
In Medidata Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 6:16 am
In Medidata Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:18 am
New York County 2012), citing, Mosher-Simons v County of Allegany, 99 NY2d 214, 219, 783 N.E.2d 509, 753 N.Y.S.2d 444 (2002), quoting Tarter v State of New York. 68 NY2d 511, 518, 503 N.E.2d 84, 510 N.Y.S.2d 528 (1986). [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am
Jonathan Masur – "The outcome in Oil States provides a possibly counter-intuitive answer as to whether panel stacking by the PTO director will remain permissible. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 9:26 am
means new bad law.United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 4:29 pm
" Harlow v. [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 2:50 pm
Many of our readers were interested in Joanna Schwartz's recent posts on rethinking qualified immunity, so I thought I'd note that yesterday the Iowa Supreme Court considered the closely related question of qualified immunity in state constitutional lawsuits (Baldwin v. [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 4:08 am
United States. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 12:21 pm
Casey, Boumediene v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:48 pm
S. 223, 233 (2009) (quoting State Oil Co. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 7:06 am
.'" Indeed, the Court has stated—and regularly restated—that government officials violate clearly established law only when "'[t]he contours of [a] right [are] sufficiently clear' that every 'reasonable official would [have understood] that what he is doing violates that right.'" The challenge of identifying clearly established law is heightened further by the Court's decision in Pearson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 6:43 am
Most recently, in his concurrence in Ziglar v. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 4:52 am
But § 1983 only applies to state actors. [read post]
30 May 2018, 6:17 am
(Dowdy v. [read post]
