Search for: "Schwartz v. Texas"
Results 101 - 120
of 147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2015, 5:47 am
Congratulations to Donald Kretz, recipient of the award and PhD candidate at the University of Texas at Dallas. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 5:00 pm
Justice Saliann Scarpulla’s recent decision in The Wimbledon Fund, SPC (Class TT) v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 5:00 pm
Justice Saliann Scarpulla’s recent decision in The Wimbledon Fund, SPC (Class TT) v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 5:45 am
For more information on this case, I recommend the following summaries and opinions of my fellow bloggers: Unanimous US Supreme Court: Constitutional Right to Informational Privacy Not Violated by NASA Background Check – from Workplace Prof Blog SCOTUS: NASA background check is constitutional – from Ross Runkel’s LawMemo Employment Law Blog Supreme Court: Background Investigations on Federal Contract Employees OK – from Human Resources News … [read post]
16 Sep 2011, 5:26 am
The case is Turner v. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 8:06 pm
Cal. 2008) (citing Schwartz v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 8:57 am
" The third granted case, Renico v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 9:00 pm
Schwartz (Brooklyn, NY)Elektra v. [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 4:30 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 24 February 2022, the Court of Appeal refused all fifteen grounds of appeal in Cheng v Pan; Cheng v Zhou [2022] NSWCA 21. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 4:41 am
Dukes – from Ted Frank’s PointOfLaw Forum Wal-Mart v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:55 am
Holthaus,, Jr., Note, Ed O’Bannon v. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 2:12 pm
This week on the Short Circuit podcast: Live at Georgetown Law, an all-star panel, including UCLA Law Professor Joanna Schwartz, discusses police accountability and Schwartz's new book, Shielded: How the Police Became Untouchable. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 8:41 am
Boutros,** and I*** have forthcoming in the Texas Law Review Online Edition. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) GSK, Tafas file petitions for rehearing in Tafas v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) Entire Federal Circuit hears argument on whether 271(f) applies to method claims: Cardiac Pacemakers v St Jude Medical (Inventive Step)… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Excess Copyright) (IPKat) (Ars Technica) (IAM) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Technology Transfer Tactics) (The IP Factor) (Patent Baristas) (ISinIP) (Managing Intellectual Property) GSK, Tafas file petitions for rehearing in Tafas v Doll (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) Entire Federal Circuit hears argument on whether 271(f) applies to method claims: Cardiac Pacemakers v St Jude Medical (Inventive Step)… [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 1:21 am
On 8 October 2015 Sir Michael Tugendhat heard an appeal from the Master in the case of Bates v Leeds United FC . [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 8:53 am
or Groves v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:48 am
Supreme Court Reverses Disparate Impact Win for Employer – from Texas Employment Law Update S. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Civic Education, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
