Search for: "Schwebel v. State" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2015, 5:54 am
Schwebel & Ruth Teitelbaum, The Latest Award from the Iran–United States Claims Tribunal: The Line Between Approximation of Damages and Ruling ex Aequo et Bono Abhimanyu George Jain, Maritime Dispute (Peru v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 3:49 am by traceydennis
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Vannes KFT v Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea & Ors [2010] EWCA Civ 1466 (20 December 2010) Chester v Secretary of State for Justice & Anor [2010] EWCA Civ 1439 (17 December 2010) Autoweld Systems Ltd v Kito Enterprises LLC [2010] EWCA Civ 1469 (17 December 2010) High Court (Chancery Division) K/S Victoria Street v House of Fraser (Stores Management) Ltd & Ors [2010] EWHC 3344 (Ch) (17 December 2010) … [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:02 am
Schwebel, The outlook for the continued vitality, or lack thereof, of investor–State arbitration Francisco González de Cossío, Enforcement of annulled awards: towards a better analytical approach Berk Demirkol, Interpretation of the dispute settlement clause in Turkish investment treaties with Turkic States Kateryna Bondar, Allocation of costs in investor-State and commercial arbitration: towards a harmonized approach Stephanie Mullen… [read post]
1 Apr 2015, 9:59 am
Cogliati-Bantz, The M/V “Virginia G” (Panama/Guinea-Bissau) Shen Wei, FG Hemisphere Associates v. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 12:53 pm
Vázquez, Choice-of-Law Rules as Geographic Scope Limitations Philippa Webb, Forum non Conveniens: Recent Developments at the Intersection of Public and Private International Law W. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 9:31 pm
Schwebel, The Nicaragua Case: A Response to Paul Reichler Paul S. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 1:28 pm
United States) is notable for revealing his concern over unequal access to documents between State Parties and the limitations on the Court's ability to establish and assess facts. [read post]
3 May 2012, 3:00 am
Think of the chilling example, given by Judge Stephen Schwebel in the Nuclear Weapons Advisory Opinion (International Court of Justice 1995), that a lawful use of a nuclear weapon would include targeting – and thereby incinerating – an army in a desert. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 3:10 am
Michael Reisman, Babel and BITs: Divergence Analysis and Authentication in the Unusual Decision of Kilic v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 2:02 am
The Court has referred in its reasoning to the ILC Articles on Responsibility of States for Internationally Wrongful Acts in its Judgment on the merits in the Congo v. [read post]
29 May 2009, 12:41 am
United States (1986), the dissenting opinion of Judge Schwebel stated that a Security Council determination of aggression is based on political considerations, and not a legal judgment, 60. [read post]