Search for: "Scott, Matter of, v Jacobs"
Results 1 - 20
of 69
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2023, 5:10 am
Finley, Kumble, Wagner, Heine & Underberg, 88 AD2d 547, 548 [1st Dept 1982]; see Matter of Jacob D. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:01 am
Truog Jahi McMath: Lessons LearnedMaya Scott Ferguson v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 3:22 am
Accordingly, the defendant's submissions in support of his motion for [*2]summary judgment did not establish, prima facie, that the plaintiff will be unable to prove the elements of legal malpractice and, thus, he failed to demonstrate his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Mueller v Fruchter, 71 AD3d 650, 651; Rosenstrauss v Jacobs & Jacobs, 56 AD3d 453, 454). [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am
But surely no origin story can be as unusual as that of Scott Bullock, the libertarian luminary who was born in, of all places, Guantanamo Bay. [read post]
29 Aug 2020, 6:39 am
Jacob Schulz posted a ruling from the U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2013, 2:36 pm
This Kat thinks that this could be the best solution to the issue, as it represents a reasonable balance between the efficient enforcement of design rights and the protection of the interests of the parties involved (see also the Court of Appeal's reasoning in Grimme v Scott). [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 3:43 pm
At para.15 of his judgment Sedley LJ quotes him:"In Vodafone v Orange [1997] FSR 34 Jacob J, invited by consent to find the single meaning of words sued on for malicious falsehood, said:"As a comparative stranger to this branch of the law I find the "one meaning rule" strange, particularly for malicious falsehood. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 2:58 pm
Johanna Gibson and with the participation of Rt Hon Lord Justice Jacob, Mr Henry Carr QC and Mr Martin Howe QC . [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 10:11 am
Practically speaking, however, the source code coalition has prepared matters to point where it requires little effort from attorneys to take advantage of this issue. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 11:50 am
Allen, Jacob Hazelton, Douglas V. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 5:51 pm
Jacob (Boston College Law Review forthcoming) Does Evidence Matter? [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 9:28 am
Doe I and Cargill, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 4:34 am
” At The Employment Law Group, Scott Oswald takes a look at Tuesday’s opinion in State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
I’m delighted to report that Michael Rosman and Michelle Scott of the Center for Individual Rights, Lisa Steele of AWARE (Arming Women Against Rape & Endangerment), and I have filed an amicus brief on behalf of AWARE in Commonwealth v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 12:12 pm
The Wall Street Journal also quotes from Jacob’s Law Dictionary on the matter of bribery: “taken largely it signifies the Receiving, or Offering, any undue Reward, to or by any Person concerned in the Administration of publick [sic] Justice. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 6:30 am
Defenders of local power will need to invoke NFIB v. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 10:45 am
Gibbs also appointed theirs — one Mr George Jacob Bridge. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 10:27 am
” At Notice & Comment, David Rubenstein argues that United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
” At the Duke Center for Firearms Law’s Second Thoughts blog, Jacob Charles looks at the implications of Rehaif v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:33 pm
Congress approved the Citizenship Clause to overrule Dred Scott and elevate jus soli to the status of constitutional law. [. . . ] Senator Jacob Howard [(R-MI)]? [read post]
