Search for: "Scott Frye"
Results 41 - 52
of 52
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 10:27 pm
Frye, Christopher J. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Frye (Univ. of Kentucky College of Law) William T. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 4:30 am
Brian Frye (Kentucky) states the case at Jurist: Law school grades merely reflect the hierarchy that pervades the profession. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 2:19 pm
Study: SUPERBUG ENTERS U.S. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 3:00 am
National/Federal At U.S.A.I.D., Juggling Political Priorities and Pandemic Response New York Times – Laura Jakes and Pransu Verma | Published: 9/13/2020 Political intervention has roiled the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), an agency that prides itself as leading the humanitarian response to disasters, conflict, and other emergencies around the world. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
One such Dred Scott case was the result of a bench trial in a federal district court in Atlanta, in Wells v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(Templeton, MA; Scott Lashua, President) 2020 Starts Now, Inc. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
New Massachusetts companies. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
The following post is exclusively the work of the Reed Smith side of the blog.Sometimes the smallest, least significant type of lawsuit can illustrate cracks in the edifice of the largest, most consequential litigation. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
The primary questions before the Court of Appeal: Whether there was [1] a failure to follow the prescribed constitutional procedure that warrants invalidation of the results of the legislature's process followed in creating the congressional and state senate maps; and [2] whether there is record support for the determination of both courts below that the district lines for congressional races were drawn with an unconstitutional partisan intent. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
The primary questions before the Court of Appeal: Whether there was [1] a failure to follow the prescribed constitutional procedure that warrants invalidation of the results of the legislature's process followed in creating the congressional and state senate maps; and [2] whether there is record support for the determination of both courts below that the district lines for congressional races were drawn with an unconstitutional partisan intent. [read post]
