Search for: "Scott v. Alford*"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2011, 11:25 pm
In a 1999 case (Dean v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 6:08 pm
Scott Alford pleas, sentencing, and a complex criminal procedural history. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
Medlin v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 9:08 pm
” [Reuters, SaveVeronica.org] Tags: AAJ, adoption, autos, California, Indian tribes, insurance, legal blogs, mortgages, oil industry, reparations Related posts March 3 roundup (1) If you’re not reading Point of Law (0) Update: Foreclosing his options (0) Update: Canadian residential schools litigation (1) Update on Mraz v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:31 am
Screws v. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 2:33 pm
The order and opinion in Alford v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
On 13 March 2012, Bean J granted an injunction in the case of BUQ v HRE. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 7:09 am
See Connes v. [read post]
19 May 2012, 6:00 am
Scott Horton looked at how debates on the accountability of private military contractors complicated negotiations on Status of Forces Agreements in Iraq and Afghanistan. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 10:45 am
But occasionally its other things.Consider the Alford plea.The name comes from North Carolina v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 9:52 am
Judges Inman and Griffin concurred. (1) Victim’s statements regarding identity of attacker were admissible as excited utterances despite possible passage of time between attack and statements; (2) Sixth Amendment confrontation argument not raised during trial was waived on appeal notwithstanding pretrial motion; (3) No abuse of discretion or prejudicial error in admission of testimony identifying defendant on a jail phone call and interpreting the contents of the call State v. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 9:06 pm
., Amber Taylor responds to her heckler by explaining how he also could get into Harvard.David Lat at Above the Law reports on the case of Steinbuch v. [read post]
