Search for: "Scott v. Braman"
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2008, 4:01 pm
Dan Kahan, Dave Hoffman, and my colleague Don Braman have responded to my post on their new article on Scott v. [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 11:02 am
A few weeks ago, I was debating the very interesting Kahan/Hoffman/Braman article on Scott v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 11:10 am
An Empirical (and Normative) Assessment of Scott v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 3:01 pm
Dan Kahan, Dave Hoffman, and Donald Braman have posted an interesting new article on Scott v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 9:09 am
An Empirical (and Normative) Assessment of Scott v. [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 4:38 pm
An Empirical (and Normative) Assessment of Scott v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:00 pm
An Empirical (and Normative) Assessment of Scott v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 11:41 am
Today's Supreme Court decision in Scott v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 3:59 pm
The occasion for the study was the Supreme Court's decision in Scott v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 5:00 pm
This is a short comment on the Court's decision last term in Scott v. [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 11:53 am
SCOTT V. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 12:48 am
Scott v. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:39 pm
Braman v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:02 am
In Maples v. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:58 am
In a Harvard Law Review article based on the Supreme Court's decision in Scott v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 10:06 am
Levine) Jenia Iontcheva Turner – Effective Remedies for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: A New Look After Lafler v. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 10:09 pm
I followed the criminal justice panels and got to attend most of them, in addition to a few other papers, and you're welcome to click below and find out what I thought was hot.The first law and psychology panel opened with Dan Kahan presenting his work with David Hoffman and Don Braman, in which they masterfully constructed and simulated the American venire to counter Scalia's remark on Scott v. [read post]
