Search for: "Scott v. Family Ministries" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2013, 1:26 am
Full story: Ministry of Justice. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:37 am by Rosalind English
R (on the application of LG) (Appellant) v Independent Appeal Panel for Tom Hood School (Respondent) & Secretary of State for the Department for Children, Schools and Families (Interested Party) [2010] EWCA Civ 142 (Read judgment here) CA (Civ Div) (Rix LJ, Wilson LJ, Sir Scott Baker) February 26 2010 An exclusion hearing by a school does not engage the pupil’s Article 6 of the Convention since there is no “civil right” to education recognized as such either by the… [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:44 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages Ltd & Anor, heard 3 – 5 March 2014. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 8:55 am by By Juan del Hierro
Juan del Hierro is director of Ministry Empowerment for Unity on the Bay and was a plaintiff in Grimsley and Albu v. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 11:00 pm by GJEL Staff
Hot Coffee Hot Coffee begins with the notorious Liebeck v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm by Deborah Heller
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania (17-647): This case asks whether the Court should reconsider Williamson County Regional Planning Commission, v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Further, the Family Procedure Rules Committee has agreed to pilot the Project’s proposals to allow legal bloggers [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 12:02 am by Melina Padron
The review panel was composed of three independent lawyers: Rt Hon Sir Scott Baker, David Perry QC and Anand Doobay. [read post]
Another example would be the understanding of the concept of jurisdiction which we finally resolved in Smith and Ellis (Smith & Ors v The Ministry of Defence [2013] UKSC 41). [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 4:43 am by Jim Duffy
The ‘Gay Cake’ Case: Lee v Ashers Baking Co Ltd and Ors [2015] NICty 2 An unfortunate misnomer but how this case came to be known in the press , Lee followed last year’s Supreme Court decision in Bull and Anor v Hall and Anor [2013] UKSC 73. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:11 am by Charon QC
Meanwhile.. over at Family Lore…John Bolch asks: Can divorce lawyers stop wives from cutting up their husbands with chainsaws? [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]