Search for: "Scott v. Kay"
Results 41 - 60
of 60
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2011, 7:09 am
Kay, 91 N.J. 159, 170-71, 450 A.2d 508 (1982) (“employer whose employees are brought into contact with members of the public in the course of their employment is responsible for exercising a duty of reasonable care in the selection or retention of its employees”); Soares v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 6:19 am
Julie Kay wrote a story on a funny email exchange that has been making the rounds. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
“ On the issue of the “superinjunction” the judgment cited the central cases concerning open justice including Scott v Scott, A-G v Leveller and ex parte Kaim Todner. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
The route to get there varies, although it will normally take in Awua, Pereira, Runa Begum, Din v Wandsworth, Monk, Kay (x2), Doherty, Quick v Taff Ely, Pye (x2), Uratemp, and so on. [read post]
25 Sep 2010, 9:16 am
Kay v UK: the general principles It can, then, be of little surprise that the ECtHR found the UK in breach of those same requirements in Kay. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:39 pm
COLEMAN; GARY OWEN and KAY OWEN; RICHARD W. [read post]
15 May 2010, 9:34 am
Kaui Jochanan Amsterdam v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 5:00 pm
v=app_2347471856Felicia Curranwww.ElderAdvocacyLaw.com [read post]
28 Feb 2010, 11:59 pm
Part V. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 4:03 pm
In Knowles v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 10:30 am
In Mary Kay v. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 1:53 pm
Rockefeller, IV Minority Statements Kay Bailey Hutchison … [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 3:45 pm
No. 19009/04) took matters no further and, in light of the criticism of that case by Lords Scott and Hope in Doherty v Birmingham CC [2008] UKHL 57, it added nothing to the general law as set out in Kay. [read post]
12 Oct 2008, 12:55 pm
The European Court of Human Rights has made clear in Connors v UK (2005) 40 EHRR 9 and McCann v UK (19009/04), that each person faced with eviction proceedings should be able to have a court assess the proportionality of the proposed eviction and, whilst the House of Lords haven’t quite gone as far as this yet, in both Kay v LB Lambeth [2006] UKHL 10; [2006] 2 AC 465 and Doherty v Birmingham CC [2008] UKHL 57, they made clear that the approach… [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Brokerage - Residential 3 stuart adler ASG Real Estate/MB Housing Broker 3 Acheson Doyle Partne Acheson Doyle Partners Architecture 3 scott wechsler WeMac Ventures LLC Development - Brokers 3 robb pair harlem lofts Inc RE investor 3 David Atlas Homebuyers Brokerage - Residential 2 Jon-Bentley Wiggins Kamenitzer Real Estate Group Commercial Broker 3 Regina Wierbowski Regina Wierbowski Real Estate Broker 3 Lynn Tesser Pridential Douglas Elliman … [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:55 pm
Their Lordships declined to vary or amend Kay v Lambeth in the light of this appeal or the last minute submissions on McCann v UK. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 11:54 pm
.; Joanne Scott, U. [read post]
