Search for: "Scott v. Municipal Court" Results 141 - 160 of 236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2018, 5:21 am by Andrew Hamm
” Jordain Carney reports for The Hill that Senator Joe Manchin, Democrat of West Virginia, is “signaling that President Trump should avoid picking a Supreme Court nominee that is openly pushing to overturn Roe v. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 7:02 am
Municipal Court, Kerr argues that it incorporates interesting and possibly chilling arguments with regard to civil liberties. [read post]
25 May 2015, 11:12 am by Laura Lestrade
  In an October 2013 decision, New York’s highest state court in Romanello v. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:51 am by Hannah Kris
Steve Vladeck discussed Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s views on Morrison v. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 1:22 pm by Andrew Hamm
Nichols, 656 F.3d 1251 (10th Cir. 2011) (joined opinion) “claim brought by Texas municipality was not redressable under dormant Commerce Clause” United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 10:19 am by Abbott & Kindermann
City of Richmond (2010) 182 Cal.App.4th 305: A municipal services agreement between the Scotts Valley Band of Pomo Indians of California and the City of Richmond did not constitute a project for the purposes of CEQA. [read post]
15 Aug 2006, 1:26 am
COURTS International Organizations Law Review (Netherlands), Volume 3, Number 1, 2006 Wessel, Ramses A, Editorial: The UN, the EU and Jus Cogens Amerasinghe, C.F., The Conundrum of Recourse to Force To Protect Persons Raab, Dominic, The International Criminal Court and the Separation of Powers O'Connell, Mary Ellen, A Note on UN v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 6:12 pm by Rick
A number of court cases in the United States have — proudly, from appearances — proclaimed: [We] have been unable to find a single instance of a criminal trial conducted in camera in any federal, state, or municipal court during the history of this country. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Finally, recent United States Supreme Court cases Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]