Search for: "Scott v. Scott" Results 321 - 340 of 9,212
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2023, 11:06 am by Lana Ulrich
Below are eight major cases that together help to tell the story of how the Court evaluated—and re-evaulated—these questions over time: Dred Scott v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rhoads 5th Senate District :Would provided for retroactive Tier V membership in the NY State and Local Employees' Retirement System to Daniel Miller S6343 by Andrew Gounardes 26th Senate District : Relates to the limitation of overtime compensation in final average salary calculations S6477 by Robert Jackson 31st Senate District : Provides home addresses of certain employees to employee organizations S6482A by John W. [read post]
23 May 2023, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Rhoads 5th Senate District :Would provided for retroactive Tier V membership in the NY State and Local Employees' Retirement System to Daniel Miller S6343 by Andrew Gounardes 26th Senate District : Relates to the limitation of overtime compensation in final average salary calculations S6477 by Robert Jackson 31st Senate District : Provides home addresses of certain employees to employee organizations S6482A by John W. [read post]
22 May 2023, 11:52 am by Avery Schmitz
ET: The Atlantic Council will host a fireside chat with the European Commissioner for Transport Adina Vӑlean. [read post]
22 May 2023, 4:37 am by Scott Bomboy
Scott Bomboy is the editor in chief of the National Constitution Center. [read post]
14 May 2023, 11:28 am by Eric Goldman
With respect to the Twitter Files, “Scott Gottlieb, a board member at Pfizer and a former FDA Commissioner who resigned in 2019—i.e., before the pandemic—wrote to Twitter complaining about one of Hart’s posts…But Dr. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
But that notion is inconsistent with the seminal compelled-speech case, Wooley v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 2:36 pm by Grabel & Associates
The seminal case for “Accessory After the Fact” is People v Luca, 402 Mich 302, 304; 262 NW2d 662 (1978). [read post]