Search for: "Scott v. Superior Court (People) (1989)" Results 1 - 14 of 14
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2013, 6:45 am by Eugene Volokh
Scott had a criminal record, with many arrests and three convictions, the last in 1989. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 8:43 am by Brett Raffish
In 1961, the Supreme Court made clear in Monroe v. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
In Riegel, the violation claims were dismissed on non-preemption grounds, and aren't before the Court. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
"Well, state court judges are savvy and powerful people. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 9:30 am by Devlin Hartline
I think some people dismissed my post completely just based on its title—the reasoning didn’t matter since the conclusions weren’t what those people wanted to hear. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
These are analogous powers that the English Superior Courts had under the prerogative writs of mandamus, certiorari, prohibition, habeas corpus and quo-warranto. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm by Dianne Saxe
Henderson of the Superior Court of Justice dated July 6, 2010, with reasons reported at (2010), 76 C.C.L.T. (3d) 92. [read post]