Search for: "Scott v. Texas State Board of Medical Examiners"
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
[Sasha Volokh] Can a state immunize its agencies from federal antitrust law through judicial review?
13 Sep 2016, 7:16 am
Texas Medical Board, a Fifth Circuit case involving the antitrust state-action immunity doctrine. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
New York State Workers' Compensation Bd. , 212 A.D.3d 126, 179 N.Y.S.3d 455 (3d Dept. 2022) [see § 124.02 n. 33], the Board’s decision to remove a medical practitioner from a list of authorized medical providers was found not to be arbitrary. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 10:32 am
United States, 20-559Issues: (1) Whether Feres v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 2:25 pm
They spoke with Nick Sawyer and Taylor Nichols, emergency medicine physicians and cofounders of the organization No License for Disinformation, about the role of state medical boards in combating disinformation related to the coronavirus: douek and Tia Sewell discussed the late release of several Meta Oversight Board decisions and why this tardiness matters. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
References within the article to California decisions, while not precedential outside that state, nevertheless provide important examples of the types of workplace violence incidents that commissions and boards find compensable. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 5:25 am
Texas, and Masterpiece Cakeshop Ltd. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2012, 5:57 am
[Rule 157.36(b)(28) of the Texas Administrative Code] states you cannot engage in activities which betray[ ] the public's trust in EMS. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
(GRAY on Claims) District Court E D Texas finds Applied Medical Resources liable for infringement of Covidien’s surgical device patent (Patent Docs) District Court E D Texas limits number of patent claims and prior art references asserted in case: SynQor, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc et al (Docket Report) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Non-practising entity entitled to permanent injunction where infringed patent was the subject of prior exclusive… [read post]
31 May 2013, 1:47 pm
Texas’ legislature passed SB 1003, which would require the state to closely examine its use of solitary confinement. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
Nicholas Burns, former undersecretary of state for political affairs; Abigail Golden-Vázquez, vice president and founding executive director of the Aspen Institute Latinos and Society Program; and Amb. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 7:18 am
: Whirlpool Corporation v Kenwood Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (IPKat) EWHC (QB): When lawfully seized items can’t be retained under s 22 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (1709 Copyright Blog) United States US General Obama IP vacancies (IP Frontline) Kappos confirmation hearing set for 29 July (IP Watchdog) (IAM) (Peter… [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
Who Is Scott Perry, Trump Ally and Lawmaker Whose Phone Was Seized by FBI? [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Two different views (Hal Wegner) Spain Motion to amend penal code on IP rights (International Law Office) Morocco Morocco signs up for Trademark Law Treaty (Afro-IP) Poland District Administrative Court in Warsaw rules ‘heritage’ has no distinctive character in dispute between Zygmunt Piotrowski and Heritage Films (Class 46) Some simplified seizures stats for 2008 (Class 46) South Africa High Court order restrains Eastwood(s) Tavern… [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:17 am
The Legislative Budget Board, however, proposed a number of additions to this cost, to better take into account the costs of complying with Ruiz v. [read post]
15 Jul 2007, 11:08 pm
Gideon v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
We've seen twice before what happens when plaintiffs start to get squeezed by preemption - during the initial flowering of the preemption defense in medical device cases that was snuffed out by Medtronic v. [read post]
28 Nov 2008, 12:14 pm
– Tackling music piracy in Africa (Afro-IP) Australia Patent infringement and account of profits: Black & Decker Inc v GMCA Pty Ltd (No 5) (IP Down Under) MONSTER ENERGY keeps battling: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) High Court provides guidance on contributory infringement provision: Northern Territory v Collins (International Law Office) PricewaterhouseCooper report… [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Innovationpartners) Europe ECJ: No simple test for bad faith trade mark registration: Chocoladefabriken Lindt & Sprüngli AG v Franz Hauswirth GmbH (IPKat) Court of First Instance: Shells all too common in bakery and confectionery sector: G M Piccolo Srl v OHIM (Class 46) European Parliament votes for greater ACTA transparency (Michael Geist) (Ars Technica) CTM fees to be reduced (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (BLOG@IP::JUR) (The IP Factor) (Out-Law)… [read post]
