Search for: "Screws v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 446
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2014, 3:33 am
Hargis had argued that this evidence would be too prejudicial.On January 13, 2014, the Supreme Court invited the Solicitor General "to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States." [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 11:23 am by Eric Goldman
The court justifies its “plain language” approach “[b]ecause this case presents an issue of first impression in Wisconsin and there is no guidance from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 1:40 am by Laurie Briggs
Reports included owners stating that the screws in the front legs of the high chair can loosen and fall out. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm by David Lat
Thomas [Supreme Court of the United States via SCOTUSblog] Maples v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 8:25 am
When the Supreme Court granted cert in United State v. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 2:11 pm by Kent Scheidegger
United States, for example, his opinion for the Court decided whether the search was legal (no) and left it to the lower court to decide whether exclusion was required under existing law. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 3:24 pm by Larry
United States while I try to take care of meaningful client work. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 2:45 am
" in particular, applicant stated that its "handheld units store inside egg-shaped divider" and that "this device includes two hand-held, egg-shaped probes that are gently pressed to the skin. [read post]