Search for: "Seagate Technology LLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 141
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2024, 12:33 pm
Seagate Tech. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 3:27 pm
” On April 19, 2023, BIS backed up its new enforcement philosophy when it imposed a $300 million civil penalty against California-based Seagate Technology LLC and Singapore-based Seagate International Headquarters Pte. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:17 am
Seagate Technology LLC, 803 F.3d 659 (Fed. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 1:49 pm
Seagate Technology, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 4:47 am
Ford Global Technologies, LLC, et al., No. 18-264 (when is a suit dismissed on personal jurisdiction grounds barred from refiling?). [read post]
21 Aug 2018, 10:00 pm
In 2007, the In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 8:46 am
Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., et al., No. 17-787 Google LLC v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 4:15 am
Edward was a patent attorney and chief patent counsel for Alliacense Limited LLC, and previously was chief IP counsel for Seagate Technology and Control Data. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 9:14 am
Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc., et al., No. 17-787 (Response Requested) AT&T Intellectual Property II, L.P. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 7:07 am
Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc. et al, 2-16-cv-00538 (PAWD January 18, 2018, Order) (Bissoon, USDJ) [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 6:34 am
(Duffy.BPAI.pdf) Joseph Casino and Michael Kasdan, In re Seagate Technology: Willfulness and Waiver, a Summary and a Proposal, 2007 Patently-O Patent L.J. 1 (Casino-Seagate) [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 7:07 am
§ 284, repealing [In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 10:15 am
Summary of Seagate two-part test for enhanced damages and the problem In In re: Seagate Technologies, LLC, the Federal Circuit previously adopted a two-part test for determining when a district court may increase damages for patent infringement pursuant to §284. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 2:31 pm
The current test for enhanced damages, set forth by the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals in 2007 in In Re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F.3d 1360 (2007), was so rigid that it essentially slammed the door on plaintiffs seeking enhanced damages. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 6:41 am
The decision rejects the objective-recklessness standard of Seagate (Fed. [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 12:29 pm
, the United States Supreme Court recently did what much of the patent world expected it would do; they overruled the Federal Circuit’s “unduly rigid” test for the awarding of enhanced damages for willful damages put in place by In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F. 3d 1360, 1371 (2007)(en banc). [read post]
27 Jun 2016, 5:07 am
Manifestó que el estándar de In re Seagate Technology, LLC id. impone una carga evidenciaría que no contempló el Congreso cuando legisló el 35 U. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 5:39 pm
The Federal Circuit had pronounced this test nearly a decade ago in In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F. 3d 1360 (Fed. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 10:02 pm
Pair of cases The Court used two lower-court decisions to announce its repudiation of the Federal Circuit’s infringer-friendly approach to punitive damages in In re Seagate Technology, LLC, 497 F. 3d 1360 (2007) (en banc). [read post]
17 Jun 2016, 11:56 am
Prior to this week's decision, it was also guided by a test elucidated by the Federal Circuit, as set forth in In re Seagate Technology, LLC. [read post]
