Search for: "Sealed Plaintiff"
Results 161 - 180
of 2,228
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2017, 10:57 am
Plaintiff owns the patent to a two-part seal for slide-out rooms in RVs. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 12:03 pm
In this patent infringement case, Plaintiff and Counter-defendant Bal Seal Engineering, Inc. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 5:49 am
Stephen Melvin Regarding Statistical Confidence Levels" [#254 filed February 3, 2014]; "Defendant Dell Inc.' s Sealed Motion to Exclude the Proposed Expert Testimony of Robert Mills" [#258 filed February 5, 2014]; and plaintiffs "Sealed Motion to Exclude the Proposed Expert Testimony of Stephen Magee" [#266 filed February 13, 2014]. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 10:51 am
The NWC believes that the transparency argument urged upon the court by attorney Sahl on behalf of the named plaintiff organizations actually results in a perversion of that concept. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:13 am
" When filing the Petition, Plaintiff moved to file the Letter under seal pursuant to Oklahoma law governing sealed court records. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
In closings at trial of a South Florida doctor accused of negligence that led to a patient's colon cancer, Keith Puya used the plaintiff's own arguments on cancer growth rates to help seal a defense win. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 2:20 pm
The court found that sealing a complaint based on Defendants' logic "would create an untenable result—the sealing of all complaints in actions in which the plaintiff does not prevail…" Moreover, "[t]he potential for a negative impact on a party's future business or social status does not outweigh the presumption of access. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:06 pm
Plaintiff then filed the instant Motion to Seal, which the Court construes as a Motion for Reconsideration…. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 1:49 pm
In Danley, the Sixth Circuit reversed the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part the plaintiff’s motion to unseal documents because the district court failed to set forth specific reasons why the public’s interest in access was outweighed by the compelling justifications for nondisclosure and why the sealing itself was no broader than necessary. [read post]
3 Apr 2017, 1:49 pm
In Danley, the Sixth Circuit reversed the district court’s order granting in part and denying in part the plaintiff’s motion to unseal documents because the district court failed to set forth specific reasons why the public’s interest in access was outweighed by the compelling justifications for nondisclosure and why the sealing itself was no broader than necessary. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 11:02 am
McBee: After an altercation with his neighbor, Plaintiff Travis Seals alleges that he was arrested at his home by deputies from the Tangipahoa Parish Sheriff’s Office. [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 8:15 am
Plaintiff, a domestic violence victim, appeals from the trial court's order denying her application to assume a new name, her request to waive the requirement to publish notice, and her request that the matter be placed under seal and not be entered in any data base accessible by the public. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:20 pm
Does 1-13, that Verizon had turned over the identities of its subscribers to the plaintiff's counsel five (5) days PRIOR to the subpoena return date, and three (3) days prior to the Court's order staying enforcement of the subpoena, thus preventing the court from ruling on the pending motion to quash (PDF) prior to disclosure.Plaintiff's lawyer, instead of immediately advising the Court, waited ten (10) days, and then calmly made what he called a "motion for… [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 9:59 am
Further, Plaintiff's request for sealing is not narrowly tailored but instead seeks the sealing of the entire case. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 5:01 am
The parties can, and should, file any documents from the Utah civil suit under seal in the instant case as they already have been doing. [read post]
20 Oct 2020, 3:57 pm
From a joint motion to seal filed yesterday in Shapeshift US, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2016, 6:13 am
The plaintiffs moved to file under seal portions of their (still redacted) motion for preliminary approval of the proposed $100 million settlement in the case, as well as parts of the proposed settlement agreement itself, and the declaration of plaintiffs’ lead counsel, filed in support of the motion for approval. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 7:47 am
Cambridge Security Seals, the Court of Appeals of New York narrowed the scope of permissible damage claims plaintiffs can assert in trade secret actions under New York law. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 8:11 am
An example of when res ipsa loquitur may apply is in a situation when a dangerous foreign object is found when a consumer opens a sealed bottle of soda. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 7:12 am
Plaintiff Corey R. [read post]
