Search for: "Sealed Plaintiff v. Sealed Defendant #1" Results 1 - 20 of 604
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Dec 2021, 11:10 am by Eugene Volokh
Marshall (the same case that yielded the Order Staying Case that I blogged this morning): Plaintiff moves the Court for an Order Sealing the File since the file contains sensitive information about the Plaintiff, and the Defendant, and in support thereof would show unto the Court the following: [1.] [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 1:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
Jul. 14, 2016) (granting motion to seal appendix to summary judgment brief where said appendix contained a chart setting forth alleged defamatory statements made by the defendant about the plaintiff). [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Third, the documents Plaintiff seeks to seal are currently available in the public record in Phoenix Capital Group Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 6:19 am by Eugene Volokh
Based on its review, and in an abundance of caution, the Court concludes that Documents 1-1, 2-2, and 18-1 should remain sealed. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 1:44 pm
The Federal Court answered "yes".In order to enjoy copyright protection under the Canadian Copyright Act [Paragraph 5(1), RSC 1985, c C-42], the work, wax seal jewellery in this case, must be (1) protected expressions of an idea and (2) original.According to Canadian case law, for copyright to subsist in a work, it must be a fixed expression of an idea. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 11:49 am by Eugene Volokh
Given that, a lawyer would be wise to frame sealing requests carefully; consider this from Newman v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 4:47 pm
From: Findlaw Summaries August 12-13, 2008 CIVIL PROCEDURE, CIVIL RIGHTS, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE, GOVERNMENT LAW Sealed Plaintiff v. [read post]
21 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Only [some weeks later] did Defendants seek to [seal] the documents. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 5:21 am by Eugene Volokh
Does: In this action against unnamed and unknown defendants, John Does 1–11 …, Richard Roe … moves to proceed under a pseudonym or, in the alternative, to seal the case. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 7:08 am by Docket Navigator
The court denied defendants' motion for a preliminary injunction to preclude the sales of plaintiffs' advanced energy vessel sealing instruments because defendants failed to establish irreparable harm. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 1:39 pm by Ralph L. Jacobson
The jury had awarded a substantial verdict for the plaintiff at trial. [read post]