Search for: "Sears v. Social Security Administration" Results 1 - 15 of 15
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Employees in the Labor Class were required to participate in Social Security regardless of their membership in ERS.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_08610.htmHistorical Note: Eligibility to participate in Social Security was made available to public employees of the State of New York pursuant to an agreement between the State and the Social Security Administration as… [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Employees in the Labor Class were required to participate in Social Security regardless of their membership in ERS.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2018/2018_08610.htmHistorical Note: Eligibility to participate in Social Security was made available to public employees of the State of New York pursuant to an agreement between the State and the Social Security Administration as… [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 8:50 am by admin
” When Sears Roebuck & Co. employee Wanda Glenn was diagnosed with a heart condition and applied for plan disability benefits, Met Life initially concluded that Glenn’s claim was valid, and encouraged her to also apply for Social Security benefits. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 3:43 pm
For example, although Glenn had qualified for permanent Social Security disability benefits, MetLife ignored the findings of the Social Security Administration in deciding to deny her claim. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
  Because the State Department performs both administrative and law enforcement functions, the Court ‘scrutinized with some skepticism the particular purpose claimed for disputed documents. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:00 am by Zach Abels
“It must gnaw at his innards,” he said of his friend, “that the administration he is serving is attempting to do this kind of damage to institutions that are so important to the security of our great nation. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 8:09 am by Lyle Denniston
The third dispute the Justices voted to hear tests whether lenders who have their loans secured are entitled to bid to reclaim the security when a bankruptcy court plans to put it up for sale. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Mary Pat Dwyer
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 13-445Issue: (1) Whether the cost-causation principle underlying the “just and reasonable” standard of the Federal Power Act permits the socialization of costs across a regional transmission network without regard to the actual costs caused or benefits received by customers required to pay those costs; and (2) whether an administrative agency may concededly rely upon extra-record evidence without providing the parties notice and an… [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  These intellectuals treat marriage equality for LGBTQ+ persons as an admirable social movement and Obergefell v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
., the cloud);[28] the Snowden disclosures and resulting suspicion of U.S. surveillance practices in Europe;[29] the U.S. government’s reaction to those disclosures;[30] the increased use of encryption;[31] the rise of ISIL and recent attacks including those involving Charlie Hebdo and the French high-speed train;[32] increased surveillance authorized by new foreign laws;[33] and perhaps other aggressive counter-terrorism activities by European governments that may be at least indirectly… [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
The more interesting questions are why they did so and why this odd little case saw the return of the usual ideological split among the justices.The tax aspect of the case arises from the Railroad Retirement Tax Act of 1937, which created a retirement system for railroad workers that was separate from the just-enacted Social Security system. [read post]
17 Nov 2013, 5:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/TWdAOrAlln -> Social Worker’s Facebook Rant Justified Termination — Shepherd v. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:42 am
Box 648 Clarkson, WA 99403 Phone: (800) 758-1123 State Developmental Disabilities Program Division of Developmental Disabilities Department of Social & Health Services P.O. [read post]