Search for: "Seats v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 5,275
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Dec 2008, 12:45 am
In Powell v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 11:23 pm
In United States v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 11:28 am
As a matter of principle, Part I could be excluded if, on facts, the juridical seat is outside India or the law governing the arbitration agreement is a law other than Indian law , as was held in Union of India v. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:25 am
United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 5:30 am
Connecticut v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 6:10 am
The Bright v. 99 Cents Only Stores decision, issued by the California Court of Appeal for the Second Appellate District last November, illustrates a recent wage and hour class action litigation trend against retail employers in California over lack of “suitable seating” for their employees. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 8:20 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 9:19 am
This morning, the United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in Heimeshoff v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 10:25 am
Article V.1 provides: “1. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 5:02 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm
State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 5:51 am
Finally, if the nature of an employee’s work does, in fact, allow for seating, the employer bears the burden of showing that no suitable seating is available (Kilby v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 9:00 pm
Circuit Courts": The White House today issued a news release that begins, "Today, President Obama nominated Caitlin Halligan for a seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and Jimmie V. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
Young, whose seat Judge Brookman fills, administered the oath at the Winfield K. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 6:50 am
Brigadier General Mark Martins’s statement regarding this week’s hearings in United States v. [read post]
25 Dec 2007, 9:44 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:15 am
State v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 8:48 am
The underlying dispute is whether such seats are classifiable as seats of Heading 9401 (duty free) or as bicycle accessories of 8714.99.8000, which are subject to a 10% rate of duty.The CAFC opinion in Kent International, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:45 am
In contrast, the State asked the 11 seated white jurors a total of 12 questions. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:26 am
In Garvey v. [read post]
