Search for: "Second Nature Designs Ltd. v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 237
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2012, 6:43 am
The Court of Appeal decision The Court of Appeal reviewed a number of authorities on the meaning of “house”, including Lake v Bennett [1970] 1 Q.B. 663, Tandon v Trustees of Spurgeons Homes [1982] A.C. 755, Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd [2008] 1 W.L.R. 289, (where the House of Lords held that, when deciding whether a building had been designed or adapted for living in, one is largely concerned with the physical… [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 2:25 pm
The United Kingdom Supreme Court recently considered the question of whether the performance standard or the design standard prescribed in the contract took precedence. [read post]
18 May 2015, 7:45 am
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. [read post]
9 May 2014, 10:10 am
In doing so, the Second Circuit addressed the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Morrison v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 4:00 am
The Cases of the Day, NML Capital, Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 11:59 am
” EM Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2023, 3:03 pm
This is a two-parter covering three decisions including Second Nature Designs Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:06 am
Bloomsbury International Ltd v Sea Fish Industry Authority and DEFRA [2011] UKSC 25 has its origins in a claim brought by importers unhappy with the imposition of a levy. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm
Nelson was second design director of Herman Miller Co. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:13 am
Miss World Limited v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 8:43 am
Several weeks ago, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Rapid Litigation Management LTD v. [read post]
27 Dec 2011, 7:18 am
Bel Canto Design, Ltd. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:21 am
Enterprises Ltd. v Defence Construction (1951) Ltd., [1994] 164 AR 399 (ABQB), affd [1997] 196 AR 124 (ABCA), revd [1999] 1 SCR 619, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/1999/1999scr1-619/1999scr1-619.html Facts The respondent, Defence Construction (‘Defence’), invited tenders for construction of a water pumping and distribution system on a Canadian Forces Base in Alberta. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 2:43 pm
Court H.R., Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom, 1 July 2008, no. 58243/00, § 62 and 63; Rotaru v. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 12:27 pm
Defendant also cited a Second Circuit case, Update Art Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:21 am
Enterprises Ltd. v Defence Construction (1951) Ltd., [1994] 164 AR 399 (ABQB), affd [1997] 196 AR 124 (ABCA), revd [1999] 1 SCR 619, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/1999/1999scr1-619/1999scr1-619.html Facts The respondent, Defence Construction (‘Defence’), invited tenders for construction of a water pumping and distribution system on a Canadian Forces Base in Alberta. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
Peter Checkland, Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester : John Wiley and Sons Ltd, 1999) is then a critical element in the way in which the legal system (in this case of the United States) interacts with the world, both as a legal and as a socio-economic-political actor. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 8:04 pm
The judgment of the Supreme Court in Iridium India Telecom Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 11:59 am
” United States v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 3:50 pm
The Pomeroy Collection, Ltd. v. [read post]
