Search for: "Secretary, Department of State"
Results 61 - 80
of 19,456
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2019, 10:16 am
House Committees Subpeona of Secretary of State Pompeo (PDF)House Committees Subpeona of Secretary of State Pompeo (Text) [read post]
28 Sep 2019, 10:16 am
House Committees Subpeona of Secretary of State Pompeo (PDF)House Committees Subpeona of Secretary of State Pompeo (Text) [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 10:08 am
Regina (Zimbabwe) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “Ministerial power to detain an overstaying immigrant was limited only to the process of deportation; any detention under the immigration provisions would be subject to the control of the courts, principally by way of judicial review. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:29 am
R (AK (Sri Lanka)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 447; [2009] WLR (D) 198 “The phrase ‘further submissions’, in the context of the Secretary of State's obligation under r 353 of the Immigration Rules to consider whether any such submissions amounted to a fresh claim for asylum, merely meant representations, [...] [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 4:00 am
W (Algeria) and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 8; [2012] WLR (D) 69 “The Special Immigration Appeals Commission (‘SIAC’) could make an irrevocable non-disclosure order, without notice to the Secretary of State, where a witness, fearing reprisals, required an absolute and irreversible guarantee of confidentiality as a precondition to giving evidence relating to an appellant’s safety on return.”… [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:13 am
Regina (MJ (Angola)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 557; [2010] WLR (D) 132 “The Secretary of State’s apparently untrammelled discretion contained in s 42(2) of the Mental Health Act 1983 to discharge a patient detained in hospital under ss 37 and 41 of the Act in order to facilitate his or her deportation on the grounds that he had committed criminal offences was to be exercised rationally and in such a way as… [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 7:50 am
Regina (Limbu and Others) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Others Queen’s Bench Division “It was irrational for the Secretary of State for the Home Department to rely on a discretionary policy relating to settlement entry for Gurkha veterans where that discretion could only be exercised in favour of indefinite leave to remain on the basis of restrictive express factors. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 2:11 am
MS (Palestinian Territories) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 25; [2010] WLR (D) 150 “The specifying of a particular country or territory of destination in a notice of a decision to remove an illegal immigrant from the United Kingdom was not an integral part of an immigration decision within the meaning of s 82(2)(h) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 2:06 am
R (Daley-Murdock) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 161; [2011] WLR (D) 56 “It was contrary to the policy and objects of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 to impose an obligation on the Secretary of State when refusing an overstayer’s application for leave to remain to make an appealable removal decision at the same time which would confer a right of appeal. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 1:36 am
Othman (Jordan) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “A foreign national could not be deported on national security grounds to a state where he was at real risk of being tried on evidence obtained by torture because such an expulsion would contravene his right to a fair trial guaranteed by article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 1:38 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 4); Same v AN; Same v AE [2010] EWCA Civ 869; [2010] WLR (D) 205 “Control orders which the Secretary of State for the Home Department revoked rather than disclose the evidence on which they were made should have been quashed with effect from the dates they were made, because they were made in violation of the right to a fair trial under art 6 of the Convention for the Protection of Human… [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 2:41 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF (No 4); Same v AN; Same v AE [2010] EWCA Civ 869; [2010] WLR (D) 205 “Control orders which the Secretary of State for the Home Department revoked rather than disclose the evidence on which they were made should have been quashed with effect from the dates they were made, because they were made in violation of the right to a fair trial under art 6 of the Convention for the Protection of… [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 1:15 am
The post Case Preview: R (Whiston) v Secretary of State for the Home Department appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:49 am
Regina (Medical Justice) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 269; [2011] WLR (D) 95 “Where a party sought permission to appeal from a judge and permission was granted on terms, that party had no right to appeal against those terms by reason of section 54(4) of the Access to Justice Act 1999, unless the party concerned was not present at the permission hearing at which the terms were imposed. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 3:37 am
R (JS (Sri Lanka)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] UKSC 15; [2010] WLR (D) 79 “An asylum seeker was excluded from protection under the Convention and Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (1951) (Cmd 9171), pursuant to art 1F(a), if there were serious reasons for considering him voluntarily to have contributed in a significant way to an organisation’s ability to pursue the purpose of committing war crimes or crimes against humanity,… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 2:08 am
(HR) (Portugal) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “Time spent in jail in the United Kingdom by a national of the European Economic Area was not counted when calculating whether he had live in the country continuously for at least ten years before the decision to deport him. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:47 am
Alton and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “An organisation that had no capacity to carry on terrorist activities and was taking no steps to acquire such capacity or otherwise to promote or encourage terrorist activities could not be said to be concerned in terrorism simply because its leaders had the contingent intention to resort to terrorism in the future. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 3:22 am
AP v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 731; [2009] WLR (D) 243 “The cumulative impact of other obligations imposed under a control order the core element of which was a 16-hour daily curfew could not provide a tipping point where, taking account of the conditions and circumstances, a curfew of 16 [...] [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 9:07 am
GO and Others v Secretary of State for the Home Department Court of Appeal “Overseas students could change their courses but if they wanted an extension of stay in the United Kingdom, they had to be able to produce evidence of satisfactory progress, whether on the course named in the application for entry clearance or on another recognised course. [read post]
8 May 2009, 3:03 am
Regina (Nasseri) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] UKHL 23; [2009] WLR (D) 148 “The irrebuttable presumption, laid down in paras 2 and 3 of Pt 1 of Sch 3 to the Asylum and Immigration (Treatment of Claimants, etc) Act 2004, that a foreign national who entered the United Kingdom via Greece could [...] [read post]
