Search for: "Secretary of Interior v. California" Results 61 - 80 of 168
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Oct 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke announced “major developments” in the expansion of offshore wind power. [read post]
Interior Secretary Order 3355 (Streamlining National Environmental Policy Act Reviews and Implementation of Executive Order 13807) (August 31, 2017). [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 6:47 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
 This case presents the question whether the Secretary may conclude that a casino “would not be detrimental to the surrounding community” despite uncontroverted evidence the casino will have unmitigated detrimental impacts to the community. 2. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 1:20 pm by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
California, omitting lands above Lake Mead, and inducing reliance on limited water supplies by others with rights junior to the Navajo Nation to the detriment of the Nation. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 8:05 am by Amy Howe
United States, that had challenged a decision by the Secretary of the Interior to take land owned by the Oneida tribe into trust, which limited the extent to which state and local governments could levy taxes and regulate activities on the land. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 12:28 pm by John Elwood
The Oneidas then successfully petitioned the Secretary of the Interior to accept transfer of certain of their lands to be held in trust; in 2008, the secretary accepted the land to “help to address the [Oneida] Nation’s current and near term needs to permanently reestablish a sovereign homeland for its members and their families, preventing alienation of the lands. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 8:45 am by Russell Spivak
Following up on a campaign pledge to end “sanctuary cities” as part of his immigration policy, President Donald Trump issued Executive Order 13768, Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:31 am by David Kris
Unless the charge is supported by the presentation of interior items from the Project, it should be relatively easy to “hush up” the entire affair . . . [read post]
18 Mar 2017, 8:00 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Whitehouse (Indian Civil Rights Act – Exclusion of Members)Round Valley Indian Tribes of California v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Whitehouse (Indian Civil Rights Act - Exclusion of Members)Round Valley Indian Tribes of California v. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 1:25 pm by Brian Slagle
” In contrast, the Act defines “States” to include, in part, “any federally recognized Indian tribe as defined by the Secretary of the Interior. [read post]