Search for: "Secretary of OPM v. Employees' Review Board"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2013, 4:18 pm
The Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) hearing the case agreed with OFCCP, and DOL’s Administrative Review Board (“ARB”) upheld the ALJ’s conclusion. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:04 pm
The Post also reports that the data breach of security clearance information at OPM took place almost a year ago, meaning that the Chinese government has long had access to federal employees’ data. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 7:29 am
OFCCP v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 6:16 am
OFCCP v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 3:45 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 11:13 am
.: CSIS will host a conversation with Secretary of the Navy Richard V. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 9:25 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 11:58 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 11:46 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
19 Nov 2018, 11:56 am
A selected Federal Government candidate will be assigned to the equivalent of Executive Schedule Level V. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
http://j.st/Swn Amador v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
The Board denied her petition for review as untimely filed, finding no credible medical evidence regarding her condition. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Concurrent with the release of the FAR interim rule, the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense issued the Memorandum re DoD Procedures Implementing FAR 4.21, Prohibition on Contracting for Certain Telecommunications and Video Surveillance Services or Equipment (FAR Case 2018-017) (Aug. 13, 2019), laying out DoD procedures to implement the prohibitions contained therein. [read post]
