Search for: "Securitas" Results 21 - 40 of 63
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2010, 8:11 pm
--Tootill v Securitas Security Servs USA, Inc., Dconn, August 16, 2010: Defendant's motion for summary judgment granted because the plaintiff could not demonstrate that a genuine issue of material fact existed over whether the employer’s reason for terminating him was pretextual. [read post]
5 Jun 2018, 11:40 am by Wesley Shelton
Securitas Security Services USA, Inc., the court posed the question of “whether a plaintiff who brings a representative action under PAGA may seek penalties not only for the Labor Code violation that affected him or her, but also for different violations that affected other employees. [read post]
25 Nov 2010, 8:25 am by traceydennis
“Two members of a gang jailed for their part in stealing £53m in Britain’s biggest cash robbery have failed in bids to overturn their convictions. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 3:02 am by traceydennis
“A company director has been jailed for concealing some of the money stolen in the UK’s biggest cash raid. [read post]
30 May 2007, 6:02 am
The record does not reflect that Securitas assumed the cost of the travel. [read post]
3 Jun 2015, 2:59 pm by Hunton & Williams LLP
In the meantime, California employers should review their arbitration agreements in light of these recent developments, as well as the California Court of Appeals recent holding in Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:23 pm by Anthony Zaller
Securitas designated its workday as beginning at midnight and ending the following midnight. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 10:45 am by Leiza Dolghih
Securitas Services USA, Securitas was asked by a client to replace an 83-year old receptionist due to her not being able to perform new technology-related tasks. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:28 pm
  No, said the Court of Appeal in Securitas Security Services, Inc. v. [read post]
” Applying the rule in Banner Estrella, the administrative law judge trying the case found the Employer’s investigative confidentiality admonition to be a violation of Section 8(a)(1) of the NLRA because Securitas had not shown that it had a particularized, legitimate and substantial need for confidentiality. [read post]
30 May 2012, 1:23 pm by Anthony Zaller
Securitas designated its workday as beginning at midnight and ending the following midnight. [read post]
1 Sep 2017, 5:57 pm by Steven M. Sweat
Factual background Steven Meier, a 59-year-old security guard who worked for Securitas Security Services, was working at a PennySaver USA facility on Oct. 20, 2013. [read post]