Diana Al-Hadid Justice Nock ruled that the agreement between Boesky and Al-Hadid “did not evince an intent to create joint ownership in defendant’s work,” and thus the Gallery has no claim to ownership.[10] The agreement only created a consignment through which the Gallery would sell the sculptures for Al-Hadid in exchange for one-third of the sales proceeds. [read post]

And it may help judges prevent (or call into question) misrepresentations about David v. [read post]