Search for: "Securities and Exchange Commission v. Hardy"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 May 2012, 12:52 pm
In Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hellicar [2012] HCA 17 and appeals relating to 6 other non-executive directors of James Hardie Industries Ltd (“JHIL”) the High Court allowed ASIC’s appeals and held that each director breached his or her duties as a director of the company by approving the company’s release of a misleading announcement to the Australian Stock Exchange (“ASX”). [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 9:00 pm
However, James Hardie lost its own appeal (see separate judgment James Hardie Industries NV v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2010] NSWCA 332), when the Court upheld a ruling that the company made misleading statements to the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) in 2002 about its ability to “meet all asbestos claims and as to remaining asbestos claims”. [read post]
3 May 2012, 12:20 pm
In Shafron v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2012] HCA 18 the High Court dismissed the appeal of Peter James Shafron, the company secretary and general counsel of James Hardie Industries Ltd (“JHIL”), against previous decisions that he contravened s 180(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) by failing to discharge his duties as an officer of JHIL with the degree of care and diligence that a reasonable person in his position would have… [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
Hardy Callcott, Corin R. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
We are examining Fiero v. [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 11:28 am
Hardy, attorney and authorPeter Kochenburger, University of Connecticut School of LawPatrick A. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 5:00 am
Puma, are or were independent under the criteria established by NASDAQ, and that the members of the Audit Committee also meet the additional independence requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 7:24 am
Courts of Appeals for the 3rd and 9th Circuits – that Item 303 of Securities and Exchange Commission Regulation S-K creates a duty to disclose that is actionable under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 4:26 pm
” Her Honour referred with approval to the following statement in Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Citrofresh International L [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 4:06 am
That same year, in Caratube v Kazakhstan, confidential information was leaked from the Kazakh government’s IT system and the claimant eventually obtained some of the leaked documents. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 11:16 am
” Id.As discussed in more detail in the FDA Law Blog post, Whitman was not an FDCA case at all but rather a Rule 10-b-5 criminal prosecution by the Securities & Exchange Commission. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am
Brighton Festival (Brighton Dome, Corn Exchange). 30 May, 9am – 7.30pm: Conference: ‘After phone hacking, what next? [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 11:30 am
Securities and Exchange Commission. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
The court found that the influencer could not give stock tips without an Australian Financial Services Licence and he was ordered to pay the legal bills of the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, who filed the claim. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 2:11 pm
Hardy, Kateryna Boguslavska, Matteo Formaggi, and Linda Friedman Ramirez. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 2:11 pm
Hardy, Kateryna Boguslavska, Matteo Formaggi, and Linda Friedman Ramirez. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
As summarised in an Isle of Man judgment, the scheme resembled a “Ponzi” scheme in that apparent repayments to HC were in fact funded in a circular way by HC itself: see paragraph 30 of the judgment of His Honour Deemster Corlett, Heather Capital Limited v KPMG Audit LLC, 17 November 2015. [9] A third party, Nicholas Levene, was a participant in the scheme. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 8:46 am
Tershakovec v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 5:29 am
Samsung: Lack of Custodian Follow-Up+Failure to Suspend Auto-Deletion of Email=Adverse Inference - http://bit.ly/MaaYhA (@LegalHoldPro) Who's Tweeting live from the Apple v Samsung trial? [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
It no doubt explains why Spotify and China's internet giant Tencent exchanged equity stakes of just under 10 per cent of each other, and why Tencent now has a $2 billion stake in Snapchat. [read post]
