Search for: "Securities and Exchange Commission v. Lawson"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 7:24 am
Second, the Court held that the Commission did not exceed its rulemaking authority by adopting Exchange Act Rule 14e-3(a) to bar trading on undisclosed information in tender offers, even in the absence of a duty to disclose.It is the first question in O’Hagan that has likely drawn the most commentary. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:50 am
In Barrick Gold Corp. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 12:59 pm
Most notably, Sarbanes-Oxley applies to all “employees” who report misconduct to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC or Commission), any other federal agency, Congress, or an internal supervisor. 18 U. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 12:29 pm
” Lawson v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
The term “whistleblower” appeared multiple times throughout the several pages of new Section 21F of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and was specifically defined as “any individual who provides … information relating to a violation of the securities laws to the Commission, in a manner established, by rule or regulation, by the Commission. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 8:42 am
He raised the case of Lawson v. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
”The government attorney directed the Justice to Lawson v. [read post]
7 May 2014, 9:30 pm
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to administer the program. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 6:47 am
Supreme Court issued its much anticipated decision in Lawson v. [read post]
SOX Whistleblower Protection Extends to Employees of Private Contractors, According to Supreme Court
6 Mar 2014, 2:26 pm
Lawson v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:28 am
Reversing the First Circuit Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court has held, in Lawson v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:28 am
Reversing the First Circuit Court of Appeals, the Supreme Court has held, in Lawson v. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 6:03 am
On Nov. 12, 2013, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Lawson v. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 8:00 am
Importantly, SOX targets the firms subject to disclosure requirements under the regulatory authority of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). [read post]
7 May 2013, 10:00 am
International Securities Exchange, LLC v. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 7:06 am
Before the First Circuit, however, the Solicitor of Labor and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) both filed amicus briefs urging the First Circuit to find that the Sarbanes Oxley Act (SOX) did cover employees, like Jackie Lawson and Jonathan Zang, who work for contractors of publicly traded companies. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
Such funds are covered by the Securities Exchange Act (1934 Act) and are required to file disclosures with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), just like other publicly traded companies. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 9:35 am
In a March 31, 2010 Memorandum and Order (also available at Lawson v. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 3:57 am
§ 1920 (PDF) t.co/f6HHAi9a (Latham & Watkins) No Resolution Reached in Pippins v. [read post]