Search for: "Security Ins. Co. v. Andersen"
Results 1 - 8
of 8
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2019, 9:27 am
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 4:17 am
Co., v Dewey Ballantine, Bushby, Palmer & Wood, 80 NY2d 377, 382 [1992]; see also Credit Alliance Corp. v Arthur Andersen & Co., 65 NY2d 536, 553 [1985] [explicitly rejecting a rule "permitting recovery by any foreseeable plaintiff"]; Ossining, 73 NY2d at 421 ["[i]n negligent misrepresentation cases especially, what is objectively foreseeable injury may be vast and unbounded, wholly disproportionate to a… [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
Rather, he stated that the factors relevant to his attorney's fees were (1) the amount in controversy, (2) the complexity of the case, and (3) his knowledge and experience—three of the eight factors set out in Arthur Andersen & Co. v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 3:27 am
Ins. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:06 am
Ins. [read post]
11 May 2020, 10:57 am
Co., 560 U.S. 242, 252-53 (2010); In re Nat’l Lloyds Ins. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 11:53 am
Protection Corp. v BDO Seidman, 95 NY2d 702, 711, 746 N.E.2d 1042, 723 N.Y.S.2d 750; see Credit Alliance Corp. v Arthur Andersen & Co., 65 NY2d 536, 553-554, 483 N.E.2d 110, 493 N.Y.S.2d 435). [read post]
20 Sep 2014, 1:06 pm
· Michel Foucault, Security, Territory, Population, Lectures at the Collège de France 1977-1978. [read post]
