Search for: "Self v. Baker" Results 141 - 160 of 413
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2016, 9:09 pm
  Authors include: Roger V Skalbeck, University of Richmond Law School. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Self v Baha’i 2015 NSSC 94 the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia discharged a cyber protection order which had been made ex parte, holding that a finding of cyber-bullying required proof of malice. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:26 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  Congress and state governments almost certainly will be forced to deal with these broader challenges regardless of the outcome of King v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 10:21 am by Steve Vladeck
Yesterday, CAAF issued its decision in Center for Constitutional Rights v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 2:48 pm by Joseph Fishkin
  Justice Harlan was dissenting from the Court’s decision in Baker v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
In this country, thank goodness, we have the mechanism of judicial review in cases like Baker v. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 6:55 am by Benjamin Bissell
Orin Kerr provided audio of this week’s oral arguments in Klayman v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 11:36 am by Katherine Pompilio
Kurup posted the unanimous court decision in FBI v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 3:20 am by David DePaolo
District Court for Central California ordered the parties in Angelotti Chiropractic v. [read post]
14 Feb 2020, 6:05 am by John-Paul Boyd, QC
’ …” he nevertheless undertook a review of other potential grounds of continuing entitlement, noting trial and appellate authority supporting the proposition that the phrase “other cause” in the Divorce Act’s definition of “child of the marriage” is to be interpreted broadly (see Baker v Baker, (1994) 2 RFL (4th) 147 (ABQB), Gamache v Gamache, 1999 ABQB 313 and Olson v Olson, 2003 ABCA 56). [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by INFORRM
The balance between privacy and transparency in regard to disclosing MPs’ expenses was comprehensively settled by the High Court in 2008, following a trilogy of Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) appeals in the then Information Tribunal: Leapman [pdf], Baker [pdf] and Moffat [pdf]. [read post]
16 May 2014, 5:35 am by Ingrid Wuerth
     The protections of the political question doctrine are at least partly gone, thanks to the Chief Justice’s Zivitofsky opinion, effectively gutting Baker v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 6:30 am by Dariely Rodriguez
This week, the Supreme Court handed down a much-anticipated decision in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]