Search for: "Sellers v. Boone" Results 1 - 20 of 21
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2021, 5:47 am by Purnel Gangiah
In Van Der Boon NO v Moletsane[1] (“The Moletsane Case”), the court held that, where a purchaser has bought a vehicle and continues to use that vehicle after discovering and reporting the defects to the seller; a purchaser does not lose the right to bring an action under actio redhibitoria. [read post]
25 Jul 2019, 10:18 am by Eric Goldman
This has been a boon to consumers, because through Amazon consumers can purchase a vast range of products, supplied by manufacturers and sellers across the globe, that would otherwise not be available to Wisconsin buyers. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm by Kevin LaCroix
A version of this article previously was published as a Haynes and Boone client alert. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:06 am by Ken Lammers
This is probably best expressed in People v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 1:54 pm
" This approach to products liability was later adopted by the Louisiana Supreme Court in Weber v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 11:51 pm
Four Paul Hastings Partners Join Haynes and Boone New York Law Journal Four real estate partners are leaving Paul Hastings to join the New York office of Haynes and Boone. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 7:18 am by Sheppard Mullin
 But the pendulum swung back in favor of good faith purchasers in January 2010, when the Ninth Circuit in Von Saher v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 8:38 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
It boils down to a question of willing buyer and willing seller. [read post]
11 Mar 2020, 12:16 pm by Eric Goldman
In the afternoon roundtable, one participant claimed that Hassell v. [read post]