Search for: "Sellers v. Edwards" Results 1 - 20 of 127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2017, 9:20 am by WOLFGANG DEMINO
At the time of Edward's death, however, Connie and Edward did not have an ownership interest in the property because Mary Rose—as the seller of the property under a contract for deed—retained title to the property. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 9:20 am by Wolfgang Demino
At the time of Edward's death, however, Connie and Edward did not have an ownership interest in the property because Mary Rose—as the seller of the property under a contract for deed—retained title to the property. [read post]
2 Oct 2018, 7:17 pm by lpcprof
In the famous popular 1st year law student case—colloquially known as the Ghostbusters case—Stambovsky, v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 8:46 am by Christopher Wright
  Yang suggested that such a law might be too “undifferentiated” and therefore fail under Lujan v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 2:30 am by Donald Dinnie
Insurers and intermediaries involved  in providing warranty and  indemnity insurance will be interested in this recent judgment dealing with contractual warranties and an indemnity of EBS International (Pty) Limited and  another v Shaun Edward Wright and which is relevant to any subrogated recovery. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 6:00 am by INFORRM
The facts The claimants are the manufacturers and sellers of the “Roadster” electric car. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 9:25 am by Lara Mouritsen
Martin, Practice Group Leader 714.424.2831 (office)amartin@sheppardmullin.com Edward H. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 2:41 am by Dave
We have dealt with the basic facts in Scott v Southern Pacific Mortgages Ltd [2014] UKSC 52 when considering its previous incarnations (Cooke v Mortgage Business [2012] EWCA Civ 17 and Re North East Property Buyers Ltd [2010] EWHC 2991 (Ch)). [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
(Accent Delight), an offshore company with Dmitry Rybolovlev as the ultimate beneficial owner, v. [read post]