Search for: "Sellers v. Gibson"
Results 21 - 39
of 39
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm
Later, the FTC reiterates: “1-800 Contacts is consistently the highest-priced seller on the internet, and consumers do not know it. [read post]
31 May 2019, 5:30 pm
Love Field.The Supreme Court is now considering whether it wants to review Love Terminal Partners v. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 2:56 pm
OED: goodwill—the privilege, granted by the seller of a business to the purchaser, of trading as the successor. [read post]
29 Dec 2016, 9:39 am
See Gibson Guitar Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 4:18 am
(IP Osgoode) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Amazon - Amazon’s importing Nestle’s ‘Smarties’ candy upsets US candy seller (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 5:59 pm
(IP Osgoode) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Lawsuits and strategic steps Amazon – Amazon’s importing Nestle’s ‘Smarties’ candy upsets US candy seller (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 11:45 am
Gibson v. [read post]
21 Sep 2017, 9:01 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:42 am
Gibson v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 11:01 am
Legally: Falwell v. [read post]
31 May 2010, 11:57 am
Linklaters represented the seller. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 6:31 am
Brownstein, Sabastian V. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
LTTB v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm
IPSC Breakout Session II: Trademarks, Advertising & Consumers Relying on Reputation Jim Gibson Reputation: what rational consumers would use to decide what products/services to buy. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 9:11 am
They asked the Delaware Chancery Court to review the “entire fairness” of the transaction, per Kahn v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 2:47 pm
Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 (1957), formulation. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:07 am
Megan M. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 2:19 am
Hence, the law governing the contract from which the third party rights are derived plays only a minor role (infra V): for those third party rights neither the special rule for culpa in contrahendo in Art. 12(1) - insofar as pre-contractual third party rights are concerned - nor the escape clauses in Art. 4(3) and Art. 5(2) lead to the law which governs the contract. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 4:30 am
The trial court's original order entering the jury verdict is available on Westlaw as Liebeck v. [read post]
