Search for: "Sellers v. Head"
Results 1 - 20
of 393
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2024, 12:10 pm
[Cite to Nunes v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 6:02 pm
Like most Americans, I believe Roe v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:45 am
Article prepared by and republished courtesy of our colleagues Stephen Taeusch, Daniel Turinsky, and Carsten Reichel; originally published here: https://www.dlapiper.com/en/insights/publications/2024/01/what-to-know-about-noncompete-agreements-in-2024 As we head into 2024, employers can expect more risk related to the use of restrictive covenants at both the federal and state level. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
New York Rifle and Pistol Assoc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:47 pm
It doubles down on the “any market” issue—first, by marrying an express concern with labor-market effects with likely (or perhaps merely potential) impact on competition “in any line of commerce and in any section of the country,” (emphasis in original–that is, in the guidelines, not the Clayton Act) and, second, by stating that “a merger’s harm to competition among buyers is not saved by benefits to competition among sellers. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 6:22 am
The Board found that there was no likelihood of confusion, and remitted the case to the Opposition Division.CopyrightNedim Malovic alerted readers to a recently-initiated case in Sweden that will apply the so-called 'best seller' provision from Article 20 DSM Directive. [read post]
21 Dec 2023, 8:54 am
Ill.) in Zorro Productions, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:24 am
”[3] In 1999, Banksy headed to London and noticed that anonymity created its own aura of mystery around his art. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
De Ford v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 10:27 am
We have been told by many that the $2.2 billion Intel v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 11:41 am
According to an article authored by New York based AON brokers Stephen Davidson, Head of Litigation and Contingent Risk, and Senior Lawyer Stephen Kyriacou, LRI allows counsel to provide certain assurances to his client that an adverse litigation outcome will not impact the client monetarily, or will only impact them to a certain predefined extent. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 4:27 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 10:26 am
Moody and NetChoice v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 10:04 am
” Butler v. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
That decision, SEC v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am
Supreme Court case (South Dakota v. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 5:17 am
Whoever gonna help me, bracha [blessing] on his head. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
at 6 (noting that the MQD “flips the normal Chevron analysis on its head”). [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 11:02 am
Sunfrog * Online Marketplace Defeats Trademark Suit Because It’s Not the “Seller”–OSU v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:10 am
By Lene Powell, J.D.Parts of the recent controversial ruling in SEC v. [read post]
