Search for: "Sellers v. Henry" Results 1 - 20 of 80
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am by Guest Author
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during April 2023  Eleven consistory court judgments were circulated in April concerning: Reordering, extensions and other building works CCVT Exhumation Churchyards and burials Organs This summary also includes CDM Decisions and Safeguarding, Reports from the Independent Reviewer, Privy Council Business, Visitations, and CFCE Determinations, as well as links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:11 am by CMS
In this post, Henry Powell (Associate) and Antoni Hajdon (Of Counsel) in the Real Estate Disputes team at CMS, comment on the case of Barton & Ors v Morris & Anor in place of Gwyn Jones (deceased) [2023] UKSC 3 – handed down on 25 January 2023. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 1:36 am by Kevin Bercimuelle-Chamot
 Henry P Yang wondered if the Court of Appeal has signalled the end of English judicial influence of Arrow declarations through its decision in Teva v Novartis. [read post]
26 May 2021, 6:39 pm by Nate Nead
The initial shock gave both buyers and sellers cold feet, resulting in a general market freeze. [read post]
26 May 2021, 6:39 pm by Nate Nead
The initial shock gave both buyers and sellers cold feet, resulting in a general market freeze. [read post]
19 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
A: Henry Smith’s idea of equity as an overarching attempt to police against opportunism. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm by Mahmoud Khatib
”[44] If a letter of intent falls within the first or second category, courts generally do not consider it binding; but if it falls in the third or fourth category, courts generally consider it a binding contract.[45] For example, in Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. [read post]