Search for: "Seltzer v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 82
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2018, 4:11 am
Seltzer, 227 F.3d 36 (2d Cir. 2000)). [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 3:31 am
” Commentary on Whitford comes from Cullen Seltzer at SandsAnderson and Jessica Mason Pieklo at Rewire.News. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:29 am
” At Quartz, Ephrat Livni discusses Dassey v. [read post]
8 May 2018, 4:15 am
Corp. v Seltzer, 18 AD3d 399, 399-400 (1st Dept 2005). [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 5:25 am
Corp. v Seltzer, 18 AD3d 399 [1st Dept 2005]. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am
Commentary on Jesner v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
See United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 3:00 am
” Commentary on last week’s decision in McDonnell v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:33 am
Thanks to Larry Seltzer for the pointer. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:45 am
However: (1) the social benefit in having a truthful depiction of King's actual words would be much greater than the copyright owners' loss, and (2) it is not required that all four fair use factors weigh in favour of a finding of fair use, as recent judgments, eg Cariou v Prince [here] or Seltzer v Green Day [here], demonstrate. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 11:32 am
Thanks to Larry Seltzer for the pointer. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:12 am
This Kat thinks that under US law the response should be pretty straightforward, in the sense of 'No' being likely answer, as any potentially infringing activities might be considered fair use within §107 of the Copyright Act, particularly because of their transformative nature [as recent examples, see Cariou v Prince, here, and Seltzer v Green Day, here]. [read post]
1 May 2014, 11:24 am
This Kat believes that Member States are free to legislate in relation to exceptions or limitations to the right of adaptation, but these must be intended narrowly, ie as limited to what can be considered as pure adaptations, not transformative uses of a work that nonetheless also involve its simple reproduction.For instance, while it is arguable that creating a play from a novel may fall exclusively within the scope of the right of adaptation, it may be more… [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 2:52 am
The copyright-related divertissement this summer was the joint IPKat/1709 Blog poll that followed the decision of the US 9th Circuit in Seltzer v Green Day (here and here) and sought readers' opinion on the following issue: Do you think that US fair use really makes a difference in terms of user freedoms? [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:00 am
The relevant section states that “The exclusive rights of the owner of copyright in a sound recording … do not extend to the making or duplication of another sound recording that consists entirely of an independent fixation of other sounds, even though such sounds imitate or simulate those in the copyrighted sound recording. [read post]
12 Aug 2013, 6:18 am
Seltzer v. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 12:46 pm
Seltzer v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 8:31 am
Law: US v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:00 am
He also stated we need to get past the language; social justice is about systemic fairness, equity, opportunity and access. [read post]
