Search for: "Seltzer v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 81
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2012, 1:14 pm by Sheppard Mullin
See, e.g., Dereck Seltzer v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:14 pm by Sheppard Mullin
See, e.g., Dereck Seltzer v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:14 pm by Sheppard Mullin
See, e.g., Dereck Seltzer v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:14 pm by Sheppard Mullin
See, e.g., Dereck Seltzer v. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:45 am
However: (1) the social benefit in having a truthful depiction of King's actual words would be much greater than the copyright owners' loss, and (2) it is not required that all four fair use factors weigh in favour of a finding of fair use, as recent judgments, eg Cariou v Prince [here] or Seltzer v Green Day [here], demonstrate. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 2:12 am
This Kat thinks that under US law the response should be pretty straightforward, in the sense of 'No' being likely answer, as any potentially infringing activities might be considered fair use within §107 of the Copyright Act, particularly because of their transformative nature [as recent examples, see Cariou v Prince, here, and Seltzer v Green Day, here]. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 11:30 pm
Seltzer and Dutta state, it really depends on why you are valuing the patents. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The relevant section states that “The exclusive rights of the owner of copyright in a sound recording … do not extend to the making or duplication of another sound recording that consists entirely of an independent fixation of other sounds, even though such sounds imitate or simulate those in the copyrighted sound recording. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 2:36 pm by Aaron Moss
Or in squaring the broad language from the Ninth Circuit’s Seltzer v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 7:12 am
Wendy Seltzer discussed the unintended consequences of legal intervention. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 6:13 am
The Machine is Us/ing Us," created by Michael Wesch, Assistant Professor of Anthropology Kansas State University. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 10:05 pm by Adam Zimmerman
  The facts are based upon a famous ethics case—Zimmerman v. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Copyright owners don’t have to state a good-faith belief in infringement under penalty of perjury; the only thing required to be stated under penalty of perjury is that the sender is an agent of the copyright owner. [read post]