Search for: "Senior v. Hope" Results 1 - 20 of 1,364
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm by Sean Toomey
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
”Believing that such conduct violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the EEOC files suit (EEOC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
”Believing that such conduct violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the EEOC files suit (EEOC v. [read post]
12 May 2012, 4:51 am by Blog  Editorial
  The case concerned the scope of the “exception” to the privilege against self-incrimination in the Senior Courts Act 1981, s 72. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 10:01 pm by Kurt R. Karst
By Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert —A year ago, we blogged about a proposed rule that would replace the Quality System Regulation (QSR) at 21 C.F.R. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm by Sean Toomey
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm by Sean Toomey
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 8:20 am by Kayla Campbell
  « Back to newsSubscribeThe post United States v. [read post]