Search for: "Sentell v State"
Results 1 - 20
of 188
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2014, 9:28 am
Circuit (Garland, Srinivasan, Sentelle) issued a decision in Shieldalloy Metallurgical Corp. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 7:11 pm
United States Court of AppealsFOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT____________No. 07-5127 September Term 200806cv00217Filed On: November 17, 2008 Free Enterprise Fund and Beckstead andWatts, LLP,Appellants v. [read post]
6 Apr 2007, 10:04 am
Judge Kavanaugh (joined by Judge Sentelle) ruled that... [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 8:46 am
Adler) Today, in United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 2:18 pm
UPDATE: I have now posted the opinions, and here’s a quick run-down: (a) Judge Sentelle’s dissent argues that GPS surveillance is directly covered by the Supreme Court’s beeper case, United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2009, 8:51 am
Instead, Sentelle relied on City of Indianapolis v. [read post]
26 Sep 2020, 12:51 pm
Judge Sentelle relies in part on the DC Circuit's August ruling in Committee on the Judiciary v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 12:33 pm
Opinion for the Court filed by Chief Judge SENTELLE. [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 2:14 pm
EVID., standards (see this column’s recent blog on United States v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:55 am
Circuit handed down its opinion in Al Maqaleh v. [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 5:00 am
Upon prompting by Sentelle, the government also explored the significance of Little v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 8:48 am
The district court dismissed the actions for failure to state a claim within the jurisdiction conferred by the ATS. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 1:23 pm
Head is a split opinion that is reminiscent of United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 1:18 am
State court certified copies of computer printouts of entries reflecting the defendant’s prior criminal convictions was presumptively reliable under FRE 803(8); the mere possibility of error in the computer records was insufficient to challenge their reliability, in United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 12:54 pm
My contribution — about Bond v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 1:23 pm
Head is a split opinion that is reminiscent of United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:23 am
Judge Sentelle, however, questioned the petitioners' standing to challenge the tailoring rule, stating to industry counsel: "The harm you allege is a regulatory burden. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:28 pm
Against the al-Nashiri backdrop, the government has now filed its brief on the merits in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:58 am
In United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:40 am
Circuit issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
