Search for: "Server v State"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,501
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2014, 1:17 pm
Because the process servers were unable to obtain personal service over the individuals, plaintiffs were granted alternate service, resulting in a dispute over the claimed attempts made by the process servers.Judge Chabot granted defendant's motion to dismiss stating simply that she was convinced that there was lying under oath by plaintiff's process servers. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:39 am
Assoc. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 2:25 pm
By Dennis Crouch In United States v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 8:34 am
MacDermid, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 11:57 am
Jennings v. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 9:50 am
Allen v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 4:44 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 3:33 pm
United States English. [read post]
24 Mar 2007, 8:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 2:33 pm
LLC v. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 6:20 pm
Torres v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 11:55 am
Department of Justice and eight states brought an antitrust case against Google LLC in the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division. [read post]
4 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
The recent case of Canada (United States of America) v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 2:48 pm
There are hundreds of thousands of Internet-connected Windows systems in the United States that still appear to be vulnerable to an exploit of Microsoft Windows' Server Message Block version 1 (SMB v. 1) file sharing protocol, despite repeated public warnings to patch systems following the worldwide outbreak of the WannaCry cryptographic malware two years ago. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 7:27 am
The restaurant’s general manager responded that most of the servers requested this arrangement, as they wished to remain “off the books” to avoid federal and state income taxes. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 2:53 pm
United States. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 3:15 pm
In Schaefer v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 8:49 am
The court certified a collective of servers in 30 states. [read post]
5 Sep 2010, 7:55 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 12:59 pm
Last week, the Second Department in Matter of Laureiro v New York City Dept. of Consumer Affairs, 2007 NY Slip Op 05509 held that it could. [read post]
