Search for: "Service Employee International Union et al v. United States of America"
Results 21 - 40
of 42
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
ET AL. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 12:07 pm
Marbley, United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, determined that Service Employees International Union, Local 1 et al. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 10:27 am
In particular, because of the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
ECORE International Inc., et al. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am
ECORE International Inc., et al. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
Certiorari stage documents:Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition of Humane Society of America et al.Brief in opposition of Edmund Brown et al.Petitioner's supplemental briefAmicus brief of the American Association of Swine Veterinarians et al.Petitioner's reply CVSG Information:Invited: January 18, 2011Filed: May 26, 2011 (Deny) Title: Brown v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:39 am
Plasteak, Inc. et al. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
20 May 2010, 12:28 am
Laborers' International Union of North America, et al. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 5:46 pm
Sign up now for a free trial account and $100 of free research and document downloads.Hayes Lemmerz Motion to Modify Retiree Benefits IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x : Chapter 11 : In re: : Case No. 09 - 11655 (MFW) HAYES LEMMERZ INTERNATIONAL, : INC., et al.,1 : Jointly Administered : Hrg. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 2:59 pm
Carlisle, McNellie, Rini, Kramer & Ulrich LPA, et al. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Obama, President of the United States, et al. [read post]
12 May 2009, 12:52 pm
The Respondent contracts with the United States Marshals Service (USMS) to provide security services at federal courthouses. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 2:55 pm
In an election held Oct. 17, 2008, the Employer's drivers and monitors cast 59 votes for Laborers International Union of North America Local 509, 77 against, and 1 challenged ballot. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Afro-IP) Peru Peru approves ratification of PCT (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property) Philippines Government says Philippines should be removed from US government watch list, despite claims from American lobby groups (ContentAgenda) Poland DIX versus DIX or judgment versus judgment (Class 46) PPO’s invalidates figurative mark belonging to FIRMA BATCZEW Stanislaw Komperda incorporating elements similar to EU flag (Class 46) Russia Video… [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 7:00 am
(The IP Factor) Uganda Anti-counterfeits conference held in Kampala (Afro-IP) United Kingdom IP rights in the Court of Appeal, but not as we know them...: Office of Communications v Information Commissioner (IPKat) IPO review of practice before Patent Tribunal (PatLit) Employee inventor compensation: an expensive pastime? [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 12:17 am
The Union filed a petition to represent a unit of employees employed by the Employer at LaGuardia Airport. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 3:57 am
Political flurries and potential trade mark wars (Afro-IP) House arrest for DVD pirate (Afro-IP) Spain Government to publish ‘Manual of Best Practices in the Prosecution of Infringing Activities’ (Class 46) Ukraine Trade marks database to be accessible free of charge (Class 46) United Arab Emirates Limitations on trademark protection (International Law Office) United Kingdom Financing creative businesses (IP… [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 3:25 pm
Petitioners International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW), AFL-CIO ("the Union"), and individual Leo Andre Ahern seek review of the National Labor Relations Board ("the Board") decision1 finding that Ogihara America Corporation ("the Company") did not violate section 8(a)(1), (3) and (4) of the National Labor Relations Act ("the Act"), 29 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 9:18 am
Financial Institution Employees of America Local 1182 (Seattle-First), 475 U.S. 192 (1986), the Board examined whether the merger resulted in such a dramatic change to the Union as to alter its identity as the bargaining representative of the Respondent's employees. [read post]
