Search for: "Service Merchandise, Inc. v. Jackson"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2010, 8:07 am
§ 56:8-2.See, e.g., Jackson v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:51 am
ABD Insurance & Financial Services, Inc., that a false advertisement claim is distinct from a trademark infringement claim and that both require separate tests. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Borello & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2008, 3:06 am
Merchandising Technologies, Inc. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 11:07 am
I am writing to put you and your company, American Powerblogs Inc., on notice that a user of your service, Powerblogs, has engaged in tortious misappropriation of my name in order to advertise and draw attention to his web site. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:27 am
For example, if you go searching for a new pair of figure skates you may run into brands such as Edea, Jackson, and Riedell. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:27 am
For example, if you go searching for a new pair of figure skates you may run into brands such as Edea, Jackson, and Riedell. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:27 am
For example, if you go searching for a new pair of figure skates you may run into brands such as Edea, Jackson, and Riedell. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 6:27 am
For example, if you go searching for a new pair of figure skates you may run into brands such as Edea, Jackson, and Riedell. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
: Omnicare, Inc v OHIM, Astellas Pharma GmbH (Class 46) CFI delivers judgment in case concerning ability of designer who assigns business and related IP to another company, to object when the company tries to register his name as a CTM: Elio Fiorucci v OHIM (IPKat) CFI: Good faith irrelevant when selling non-misleading sausages: Alberto Severi, in his own name and representing Cavazzuti e figli SpA, now known as Grandi Salumifici Italiani SpA v Regione… [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 6:29 pm
v=XCbPFHu3OOc. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Energy Safety Servs., Inc., No. 08-1013ADA - Whether driving is a major life activityo SCOTUS docket hereOakley v. [read post]
