Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman"
Results 201 - 220
of 361
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2024, 12:01 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 8:25 pm
And my colleague Seth Barrett Tillman wrote about this precise issue in 2015. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
[Not exactly what I expected, but a very rewarding experience. ] As regular readers will know, Seth Barrett Tillman and I have spent untold hours over the past six months, and really past three years, on Section 3. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 3:52 am
” As I explained in an essay this summer, Seth Barrett Tillman’s scholarship on this question (once I really understood it) has influenced me. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 7:04 am
Prior to the election, William Baude wrote that “Professor Tillman’s theory makes sense of patterns that most of us never saw. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 1:00 am
Entries in an originalist debate between Zephyr Teachout and Seth Barrett Tillman over political corruption and the Foreign Emoluments Clause are here and here. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 8:01 pm
Trump lawsuits on behalf of another legal scholar, Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 9:06 am
(Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote about the order here.). [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 7:26 am
In the Atlantic, Seth Barrett Tillman and I expressed our disagreement with the Amars. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 1:34 pm
Here is the abstract: In this essay, I respond to a debate between Geoffrey Stone, Seth Barrett Tillman, Alan Brownstein, and others about the complex relationships between the authors of the 1787 Constitution, contemporaneous religious practices and beliefs, and the enterprise of constitutional interpretation and textual exegesis. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 6:19 am
Seth Barrett Tillman) is available here.The post C-SPAN Washington Journal Appearance on the Trump Section 3 Case appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 5:44 pm
Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman are nevertheless determined to repeat their comedic performance of December 2021 when they posted on SSRN an essay claiming, contrary to the evidence and common sense, “that the President is not a Section 3 ‘officer of the United States. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 3:55 pm
Over the past two years, Professor Seth Barrett Tillman and I have written extensively about the practices of President Washington. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 1:54 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman made this case, and I have yet to see anyone respond. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 9:30 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman, National University of Ireland, Maynooth Faculty of Law, asks What Court (If Any) Decided Ex parte Merryman? [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 11:34 am
Seth Barrett Tillman suggested that the Senate rules on impeachment do not require a full trial and that the Senate votes separately on removal and disqualification. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 9:30 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman on the impeachment of Associate Justice Samuel Chase, and Roland Nikles, a San Francisco attorney, on Worcestor v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 9:30 pm
" Also, Seth Barrett Tillman notes that the Congressional Research Service has revised its guidance on the Foreign Emoluments Clause. [read post]
8 May 2020, 9:30 pm
Lytle, Jilll Hasday, Seth Barrett Tillman, and Justin Simaud. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 12:10 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman and Josh Blackman questioned whether special counsel Robert Mueller is an “officer” or “employee” of the United States. [read post]
