Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman" Results 241 - 260 of 347
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2017, 10:00 am
"Yes, Trump Can Accept Gifts": Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman have this essay online at The New York Times. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
  Seth Barrett Tillman's slides from his talk, Ex parte Merryman: Myth, History, and Scholarship, at the Federalist Society’s faculty conference in 2016. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Seth Barrett Tillman’s amicus brief in CREW v. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 6:05 am by Eugene Kontorovich
On Friday, the Justice Department filed its brief in the Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) case (using a variety of arguments developed by academics including Andy Grewal, Seth Barrett Tillman and myself). [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
  Also, Seth Barrett Tillman, Business Transactions and President Trump’s “Emoluments” Problem.Here's the CFP for a NYU/New School workshop on Oct.7 on "Global Histories of Capital: New Perspectives on the Global South. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 5:43 am by Eugene Kontorovich
Seth Barrett Tillman has presented strong evidence of the allowance of business dealings from Washington’s public conduct in relation to the domestic emoluments clause.) [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
"Seth Barrett Tillman, interviewed on the Military Law Review’s podcast, on Ex Parte Merryman: Myth, History, and Scholarship. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  Also, Seth Barrett Tillman on why Business Transactions for Value are Not "Emoluments. [read post]
11 Jan 2017, 6:16 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Tillman, Seth Barrett and Teachout, Zephyr, The Foreign Emoluments Clause: Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 (August 8, 2016). [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 3:52 am by Will Baude
” As I explained in an essay this summer, Seth Barrett Tillman’s scholarship on this question (once I really understood it) has influenced me. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 10:31 am by Tom Smith
The real meaning of the Emoluments Clause, this theory concludes, stayed largely shrouded in the mists until the 21st century, when Seth Barrett Tillman, a law professor in Ireland, revealed it to the world. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
"  Also, Seth Barrett Tillman notes that the Congressional Research Service has revised its guidance on the Foreign Emoluments Clause. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 4:15 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
The issues have, if anything, intensified with the election of Donald Trump, and the Foreign Emoluments Clause has become a hot topic, as evidenced by Professor Zephyr Teachout’s op-ed [and Professor Seth Barrett Tillman’s counterpoint] in yesterday’s New York Times. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 5:58 am by Steven D. Schwinn
Check out Seth Barrett Tillman's (Maynooth U., Ireland) contribution to the debate over Trump and foreign gifts in the NYT. [read post]
4 Nov 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
ICYMI: Former LHB guest blogger Greg Ablavsky quoted in an NPR story on the acquittal of Ammon Bundy and his associates; Seth Barrett Tillman on President James Buchanan, Chief Justice Roger Taney, Copperheads—and the Quakers; John D. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:34 pm by Jamie Baker
Professor Rosen’s article, Funding “Non-Traditional” Military Operations: The Alluring Myth of A Presidential Power of the Purse, was cited in the following article: Seth Barrett Tillman, Ex Parte Merryman: Myth, History, and Scholarship, 224 Mil. [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
  "Roger Brooks Taney Was as Bad as You Think"; Michael Ramsey on Seth Barrett Tillman on the Presentment Clause.If you're missing out on this year's meeting of the American Society for Legal History, you can follow the conversation on Twitter. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm by Mitra Sharafi
  Seth Barrett Tillman on The Journals Clause. [read post]
8 Oct 2016, 7:51 am by Randy Barnett
Over a year ago, Seth Barrett Tillman challenged the conventional teaching on Merryman in a couple short essays on SSRN (here and here) and, earlier this year, in a blog post that took particular aim at Professor Paulsen’s use of the case. [read post]