Search for: "Settlement Funding, LLC v. Rapid Settlements"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2016, 12:18 pm
Duran v. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 10:37 am
Settlement Funding, LLC D/B/A Peachtree Settlement Funding as Seller/Servicer for Peachtree Finance Company, LLC Plaintiffs v Rose Garcia, Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company and the United States of America United States District Court Western Texas Waco Division Civil Action W-04-CA 339 Decided December 12, 2006 In response to an Interpleader action, the United States requested confirmation of its contractual rights as… [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 1:11 pm
Subsequently Feldman, who some in the factoring industry might feel is as diabolical as his Griffin name sake, filed for a Temporary Restraining Order, Preliminary Injunction and Permanent Injunction in a matter styled The Feldman Law Firm, LLP and rSL Funding, LLC v Settlement Funding, LLC D/D/A Peachtree Settlement Funding (2010-03192) 113th Judicial District Court, Harris County, TX. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 5:12 pm
Settlement Funding, LLC, complaint filed in 2011 (described here) - has spanned more than a decade. [read post]
26 Dec 2018, 8:39 am
In RSL Funding, LLC v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:00 am
(“JCG”) and Janus Capital Management, LLC (“JCM”) have admitted that they "had, for years, entered into secret arrangements to allow several hedge funds to engage in market timing transactions in various Janus Funds. [read post]
6 May 2010, 8:35 am
See also Settlement Funding, LLC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
18 Jul 2009, 7:31 am
” Second, Chairman Schapiro provided for more rapid approval of formal orders of investigation authorizing the staff to issue subpoenas by permitting approval within a couple of days pursuant to the SEC’s “seriatim” or “duty officer” procedures. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 8:14 am
Co. v Rapid-Am. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 1:11 am
Mayberry Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids 08a0308p.06 2008/08/21 USA v. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 8:50 am
Hewitt v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:45 am
The decision by the United States to support the Declaration was the result of a thorough review of the Declaration by the relevant federal agencies.1 In conducting its review of the Declaration, U.S. agencies consulted extensively with tribal leaders during three rounds of consultations, one in Rapid City, South Dakota, and two in Washington, D.C. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm
In 1968, a court decision, Escott v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 6:48 pm
voluntarily recognized the Union and consented to be bound to the collective-bargaining agreements by its conduct of paying its union-member employees prevailing wages and submitting remittance reports, employee fringe benefit fund contributions and dues to the Union. [read post]
9 Jan 2020, 12:03 pm
Applied Sierra Club v. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm
Mootness done right – extreme version In Johnson v. 162 Los Gatos-Saratoga Rd., LLC, 2019 WL 2869949, (N.D. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
Grove Family, LLC,2 City of Novi v Robert Adell Children’s Funded Trust,3 and Township of Grosse Ile v Grosse Ile Bridge Co.4 Last, the UCPA (the procedural statute applicable to all condemnation actions in Michigan) provides that a condemning agency’s finding of necessity will only be reversed for “abuse of discretion, error of law, or fraud. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
; Work Matters; Law.comArgued Awaiting Decision14 Penn Plaza LLC v. [read post]
