Search for: "Seward v. Seward"
Results 1 - 20
of 123
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2023, 3:00 am
” Smith v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:15 am
The deceit under Judiciary Law § 487 and fraud claims were insufficiently pleaded because they do not identify any misrepresentation made by defendants (see Bill Birds, Inc. v Stein Law Firm, P.C., 35 NY3d 173, 178 [2020]; Eurycleia Partners, LP v Seward & Kissel, LLP, 12 NY3d 553, 559 [2009]; CPLR 3016 [b]). [read post]
8 May 2023, 11:23 am
Fuller v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:58 am
Here, the cause of action alleging breach of fiduciary duty was subject to a three-year statute of limitations since the relief sought was monetary in nature and the complaint failed to allege all the requisite elements of fraud, including justifiable reliance (see Eurycleia Partners, LP v Seward & Kissel, LLP, 12 NY3d 553, 562; IDT Corp. v Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., 12 NY3d at 140; Oppedisano v D’Agostino, 196 AD3d 497, 499). [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 3:10 am
Based on this conclusion, in Shalov v Brisbane Assocs. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am
Guthrie and Cravath The era of the white-shoe lawyer arguably began on May 1, 1899, when Paul Cravath, then a 37-year-old corporate lawyer lateraled into the Seward law firm, thus becoming the law partner of 40-year-old William Guthrie in the firm that would eventually evolve into Cravath Swaine & Moore. [read post]
16 May 2022, 12:19 pm
Finally, it barred Chinese immigrants from becoming citizens, though the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 5:00 am
In his dissenting opinion in Chew Heong v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 3:55 am
“‘The elements of a cause of action for fraud require a material misrepresentation of a fact, knowledge of its falsity, an intent to induce reliance, justifiable reliance by the plaintiff and damages'” (Emby Hosiery Corp. v Tawil, 196 AD3d 462, 464, quoting Eurycleia Partners, LP v Seward & Kissel, LLP, 12 NY3d 553, 559). [read post]
22 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
Specifically, Judge Kaplan appointed the law firm of Seward & Kissel LLP (Seward). [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 3:14 am
A claim rooted in fraud must be pleaded with the requisite particularity under CPLR 3016 (b)’ ” (Shahid v Ridgewood Bushwick Senior Citizens Council, Inc., 181 AD3d 744, 745 [2020], quoting Eurycleia Partners, LP v Seward & Kissel, LLP, 12 NY3d 553, 559 [2009]). [read post]
7 May 2021, 3:58 am
To sustain a cause of action for breach of contract, the plaintiff must prove the existence of a contract, the plaintiff’s performance, the defendant’s breach, and damages (see Harris v Seward Park Hous. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 5:47 am
(Harris v Seward Park Hous. [read post]
18 Mar 2020, 5:00 pm
(c) v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm
These ‘reforms’ are now giving a free pass to many individuals who commit serious crimes that place our communities at risk” [https://www.nysenate.gov/petitions/james-l-seward/repeal-bail- reform]). [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 2:09 pm
In Leser v. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Durand v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:03 am
Sapienza v Becker & Poliakoff 2019 NY Slip Op 05218 Decided on June 27, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department is an example: “Plaintiff’s fraud claim was properly dismissed, as plaintiff did not allege “actual pecuniary loss sustained” by plaintiff’s decedent individually “as the direct result of” defendants’ alleged fraud (Lama Holding Co. v Smith Barney, 88 NY2d 413, 421 [1996] [internal quotation… [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 6:03 am
Sapienza v Becker & Poliakoff 2019 NY Slip Op 05218 Decided on June 27, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department is an example: “Plaintiff’s fraud claim was properly dismissed, as plaintiff did not allege “actual pecuniary loss sustained” by plaintiff’s decedent individually “as the direct result of” defendants’ alleged fraud (Lama Holding Co. v Smith Barney, 88 NY2d 413, 421 [1996] [internal quotation… [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 2:45 pm
Ct. 1061 (2016)Sturgeon v. [read post]
