Search for: "Shank v. Fields" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 May 2014, 12:15 am
It's Shanks v Unilever Plc & Others [2014] EWHC 1647 (Pat), a Patents Court for England and Wales ruling of the indefatigable Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 7:48 am
This morning the UK Supreme Court handed down its decision in Shanks v Unilever ([2019] UKSC 45) concerning Professor Shanks' long battle to receive compensation for his invention from his former employer, Unilever. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 9:16 am
Since the release of the UK Supreme Court's decision in Unilever v Shanks [2019] UKSC 45 (IPKat post here) the mainstream and social media have been awash with hyperbole as to the potential impact of the decision on large employers. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 1:26 am
  The Court of Appeal has provided guidance on the relevance of this issue to the question of "outstanding benefit" in the long running dispute of Shanks v Unilever PLC and others [2017] EWCA Civ 2. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 9:50 am
The case was Santa Fe Independent School Dist. v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 3:43 pm
  Duncanville Independent School Dist., v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
The state of the art defense cases thus provide a well-established body of law, and a reasonably numerous collection of factual analogies for dealing with the knotty question of whether there was insufficient "new" information for the FDA to allow a CBE submission, and thus for the application of preemption.Here are the state-of-the-art cases that we're familiar with in our limited field of drug and medical device product liability litigation:Alaska: Shanks… [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
These are especially common in the field of drugs. . . . [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 8:00 am by Legal Beagle
The losing competitor was Shanks, a business with vast experience in the field of waste management throughout the UK.But the release of highly confidential documents during the course of 2016/17 following SEVEN separate applications to the Scottish Information Commissioner to overturn refused Freedom of Information requests, shows the project had hit funding and technological problems by January 2012, only nine months after the contract was handed to NESG. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
This rule proposal would cover all sectors of the securities markets, including equity, fixed-income, and crypto asset securities.[12] Second, we proposed updating a 23-year-old rule, known as Rule 605, on order execution quality.[13] Third, we have a proposal to better level the playing field between dark and lit markets. [read post]