Search for: "Shannon v. State" Results 241 - 260 of 607
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2017, 1:39 pm by Jamie Baker
Camp’s article A History of Tax Regulation Prior to the Administrative Procedure Act was cited in the following article: Brian Boyd, State v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 11:53 am
Defendant stated that he could not take it anymore, and he decided to kill a woman. [read post]
3 May 2017, 7:43 am by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Sufficiency of the evidence — Exploiting a vulnerable adult A jury in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County convicted Darrell Shannon Lang (“Appellant”), of sixteen crimes stemming from a home improvement fraud scheme perpetrated over a two-week period against a ninety-year-old victim. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 1:12 pm by Chris Castle
 All of the proxies started dancing (you can find most of them on the venerable Google Shill List from the Oracle v. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 1:18 pm
Not only did the Plaintiffs sue the driver who struck their motorcycle, but they also sued Shannon Colonna, the party who allegedly was texting the defendant motorist. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 7:00 am by Jordan Brunner
Shannon Togawa Mercer flagged a new book on the legal implications of Brexit, of which she is one of the authors. [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 6:01 am by John Floyd
  According to a brief prepared by a group of prominent attorneys and filed with the court in the case of Nelson and Madden v. [read post]
            Department of State (DOS): DOS Acquisition Regulation (DOSAR) § 652.239-71—This clause notes that contractor failure to comply could result in contract termination. 48 CFR 652.239-71(m). [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:10 pm
Not only did the Plaintiffs sue the driver who struck their motorcycle, but they also sued Shannon Colonna, the party who allegedly was texting the defendant motorist. [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
First on the agenda is Murr v. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 7:57 am by Jamie Baker
Straut, Due Process Disestablishment: Why Lawrence v. [read post]