Search for: "Sharp v. Warden"
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2012, 6:50 am
The opinion in Howes, Warden v. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 3:09 pm
Marking Miranda v. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 7:56 am
Abassi (formerly Turkmen v. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 9:15 pm
” [via FindLaw] Sharp v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:48 pm
Warden, 613 A.2d 818, 821 (Conn. 1992)(statutory right to habeas counsel would be a “useless formality” if counsel not required to be effective and competent); Commonwealth v. [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:05 pm
Just before the Christmas break, however, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Clift v Slough Borough Council ([2010] EWCA Civ 1171). [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 6:35 pm
” In Favor of the Prosecution or Warden Milo A. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 2:31 pm
In Boumediene v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 9:22 pm
Rochin v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
” Week of October 18, 2010: In Favor of the Prosecution or Warden Jimmy Wayne Lawrence v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
John Reed Stark Many of us have been following the continuing battle between Apple and the U.S. government on whether the government can required the company to unlock the iPhone of the San Bernardino terrorist, Syed Rizwan Farook, with a combination of confusion and concern. [read post]
