Search for: "Sharpe v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue"
Results 1 - 20
of 25
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2016, 8:19 am
Commissioner of Internal Revenue (1991)—has concluded are constitutional officers. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 11:21 am
Does the Internal Revenue Service have the right to regulate tax preparers? [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm
On 26 June 2019 Dame Victoria Sharp was sworn in as the new President of the Queen’s Bench Division, replacing Sir Brian Leveson who retired on 23 June 2019. [read post]
25 May 2019, 7:19 am
§ 7701(a)(14) as “any person subject to any internal revenue tax. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 4:53 am
Commissioner of the Internal Revenue, 69 TCM 2852 [1995]), the company argued, the reality that such control would vanish in a hypothetical sale must also be considered. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 4:45 pm
” The news received wide international coverage. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
The same blog also notes the refusal of the Court of Appeal to grant permission to appeal in the case of Craven v Information Commissioner & DECC, permission to appeal. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 13 December 2018 Master Giddens gave an ex tempore judgment in the slander claim of Kenny v Commissioners for HM Revenue and Customs. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am
On the same day the oral renewal of the application for permission to appeal in the case of Weston v Bates was refused by Sharp LJ. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 11:29 am
[emphasis added] While most search engines are commercial enterprises and supported by advertising revenue, it does not charge users for search results and it does not charge content providers to be indexed in the search engine for inclusion in search results. [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 12:25 am
Sharp case. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
For an example, look no further than the celebrated Costeja v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am
On the same day there is an application concerning mode of trial in the case of Lewis v Commissioner of Police before Tugendhat J. [read post]
1 May 2019, 7:30 am
Love letter from the IRS The “why” is found in Internal Revenue Service INFO 2002-0024 (released 3/29/2002). [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Texas Tax Court Judge Ronald Buch ruled that the petitioners “may use predictive coding in responding to respondent’s discovery request” and if “after reviewing the results, respondent believes that the response to the discovery request is incomplete, he may file a motion to compel at that time”. [read post]
23 May 2021, 4:08 pm
Junejo v New Vision TV Limited, heard 24 and 25 March 2021 (Murray J) Miller v College of Policing and another, heard 9 and 10 March 2021 (Sharp P, Haddon-Cave and Simler LJJ) Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 22 and 24 February and 1 March 2021 (Nicklin J) Wright v McCormack,&nb [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 5:45 pm
Newspapers, Journalism and Regulation David Erdos, writing for Inforrm in two parts, takes a first look at the Information Commissioner’s Office Draft Data Protection and Journalism Code. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 2:31 pm
Director of Virgin Islands Bureau of Internal Revenue, Judge Hardiman’s opinion for the Court held that prior to 2004, taxpayers could establish “bona fide residence” regardless of whether their intent was to avoid tax liability or not. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
: (Spicy IP),Recent trends in IP strategy – an excerpt from London talk: (IP ThinkTank),World Customs Organisation recommends far-reaching new rules on IP: (Intellectual Property Watch),Members seek ways to move policy in WIPO Traditional Knowledge Committee: (Intellectual Property Watch)Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / BrandsXerox – avoiding genericide: (Afro-IP),Big business urges adoption of Anti-Counterfeiting Treaty: (IP Justice),WIPO press release ‘Record… [read post]
28 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
’: (LawFont.com)BrazilElectronic copies of oppositions now available on internet: (International Law Office)CanadaSam Trosow on latest CMEC copyright bulletins: (Michael Geist),ComputerWorld Canada on copyright reform: (Michael Geist),Deemed abandonment provisions pose traps for the unwary: (International Law Office),Trade mark appeals: stays and service requirements: (Canadian Trademark Blog),Franchising into Canada: (IP finance),More Champagne, anyone? [read post]