Search for: "Sharpe v. Sharpe" Results 121 - 140 of 4,090
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Aug 2019, 10:04 pm by Byron Stier
Here is the abstract: This article discusses the Supreme Court's recent decision in Merck, Sharp & Dohme v.... [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 6:58 am
provide evidence for Brian Wesbury's theory of a sharp "V" recovery, as does Intel's news.Wesbury will be on in the second hour today's program to summarize the economic news of the week.Imagine how strong the economic [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 4:46 am by Lyle Denniston
The heart of the dissent was its argument that lower courts are still bound by the Supreme Court’s one-line decision in 1972 in the case of Baker v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 7:02 pm by Curt Cutting
In this unpublished opinion, the California Court of Appeal (Second Appellate District, Division Seven) affirms a punitive damages award in excess of $5.2 million. [read post]
10 Apr 2011, 1:43 am
In my article "Divided by a common language: US and UK patent law" which was published in Science, People & Politics (April to June 2011) I noted that one of the differences between US and UK patent law was that 35 USC 102 (b) of the US act permits an application for a US patent even where the invention has been described in a publication or application for a foreign patent that has been made in [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 12:34 pm
Who says the California Supreme Court can't be short and to the point? [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:05 pm by Oyez Project
The court heard argument this week in: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 11:40 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) MA v Merck Sharp & DOHME Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1426 (16 December 2008) Animatrix Ltd & Ors v O’Kelly [2008] EWCA Civ 1415 (16 December 2008) Calvert v William Hill Credit Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1427 (16 December 2008) Allan v Johnson Controls Automative (UK) Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 1377 (16 December 2008) Smith [...] [read post]